305 condos replacing apartments

May 14, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Renaissance BayA $150-million luxury condo development known as Renaissance Bay will replace an apartment complex along Keystone Avenue at 78th Street. All that remains of The Landings apartments are massive piles of concrete and bricks. Construction is set to begin in July on the replacement, a development of 305 condos ranging in price from $350,000 to $800,000. The project, by Sun Shiel Properties LLC, will feature buildings as tall as five stories inspired by the architecture of South Carolina. The structures will surround a large lake that connects to the White River. More images here.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • This looks great, but at what point does the $270,000 condo market hit saturation in this market? Why am I paying 800K to live on Keystone when I can buy a palace downtown for that? I forsee a huge collapse in the condo market. Property Lines, a Hershey's mini chocolate bar for your thoughts?
  • I think there will definately be people who will pay 800K to live in that area, with proximity to the Fashion Mall/Keystone Crossing, 86th Street and even Carmel.
  • Another note: I'm glad to see high density projects popping up in other areas of the city besides downtown. It's what the city needs.
  • That's certainly a market for posh condos in that area, but $800k seems a little ridiculous. High-priced extras -- hardwood floors, granite counter tops, etc. -- can only push the price so high. Condos go for this price in downtown because the underlying land is so valuable. The land cost in this area certainly doesn't approach downtown. And if the square footage of the condo goes high enough, wouldn't most people rather just buy a house? Like Kevin said, $800k buys you a VERY large house in downtown. In that area, it buys you a mansion.
  • For $775,000, you can have 5,000-plus square feet in Oxbow. And that's just one example.

    Methinks they're really reaching on this one.

    Ooooh, great, I can pay a bunch of money to live off traffic-laden Keystone just a stone's throw away from Wal-Mart and a couple of strip centers. But hey, there's a retention pond. Who doesn't love a retention pond?

    Blah.
  • Forget Fashion Mall, Keystone at the Crossing, 86th St., and esp. Carmel, you're mere seconds away from Wal-Mart and a Starbucks! Any chance they construct a walking trail to Wal-Mart?

    For me, I wouldn't pay $800k for a unit when you can't safely and easily make a left-hand turn onto Keystone, not that anyone will.
  • the naysayers are missing the point...this is a beautiful project with high density. high density is what this city needs. ever stop to think that with a high-end project like this comes other high-end projects? there is already class-a office space being developed along 465 in addition to what is already built. maybe this development will spur re-development of walmart, etc. and since when is living near a starbucks a bad thing? yes, it's a chain, but a very nice one. this area is unfortunately stuck in the 1970's and hopefully this will be the first of many new developments.
  • ryan -- I think you misunderstand (or at least misunderstand ME). I'm not naysaying their design, their density or their high-end aspirations. I just question how they're going to make an $800k condo. The $800k condos in downtown are, for example, large condos on Mass Ave with views of the skyline and high-end styling. These condos may be large and they may have high-end styling, but they're on an expressway (Keystone) with a view of a retention pond as Wags put it. These aren't exactly one-of-a-kind characteristics like living on Mass Ave or having a skyline view.

    I do wish the developers good luck in finding buyers for their high-end condos because I think this is a wonderful project for the area.
  • $350,000 to $800,000?! Did they forget this is Indianapolis?
  • Uhm... I think this is GREAT! I mean seriously to think they could've built in Carmel or Fishers instead (which would've been dumb) all i'm sayin is i am so SO happy that they are actually redeveloping this! Just like the Belle Meade revdevelopment @ 96th & Ditch! This can only be a good thing for Indianapolis & the greater Northside! ;-) So i am quite happy these developers are doing this.
  • Having just moved just accross the river at Sandy Pointe, I couldn't be happier. This property development probably added $100k to my value.
    Everone is forgetting the emty nesters. I'm one and love the lifestle in this area. That's who will be paying 800K for a latge condo with water view. Also, the lake is really a cove connected to the White River. Great boating and bass fishing.
  • Hi Jim. Photos i received. Thanks
  • No Way.
    I live in Crystal Lake and I can almost hit the Keystone Mall with a Golf Ball and we have single family homes on water and they have been building them for years.

    No way they will fill one unit. Let alone 300 - only if they want to keep building for 25 years. And who wants to live in that mess....
  • Thank you for sharing!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT