IBJNews

$60M Lilly Endowment grant to fund IU physician research

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana University School of Medicine on Tuesday morning is scheduled to announce a $60 million grant from Lilly Endowment Inc. to support physician research.

IU plans to use the money to implement its new Indiana Physician Scientist Initiative, an effort to promote scientific discoveries that could improve human health, then commercialize them into products and treatments that benefit patients and produce new businesses and jobs.

Lilly Endowment previously had given IU $155 million to help underwrite its Indiana Genomics Initiative, which became a catalyst for Indiana life science investment and helped spur the creation of life science initiative BioCrossroads.

Repeated Lilly Endowment grants have enabled IU to move into the top ranks of life science and information technology research institutions, said IU President Michael McRobbie in a written statement.

“All told, the Lilly Endowment has given nearly $600 million to Indiana University over the past three decades, and I have no doubt that this latest grant will again have a transformative impact at IU and all across the state,” he said.

Lilly Endowment funds have also supported the $53 million Indiana Metabolomics and Cytomics Initiative, the $45 million Pervasive Technology Initiative and the $10 million Excellence in Indiana Initiative, which provided $10 million to recruit neuroscience researchers.

IU has leveraged Lilly Endowment’s gifts to attract major grants from other institutions. The Indiana Genomics Initiative alone has attracted another $682 million in research grants, which ultimately has led to more than 60 international patents and the formation of four life science startup companies.

“We are focusing on physician-scientists with this initiative because we know the strength of this combination of skills and training and the need for more of these scientists in today’s research environment,” said Dr. Craig Brater, dean of the IU School of Medicine. “This award will allow us to recruit a cluster of intellectual talent that will both mesh with and enhance our current strengths and will pay dividends for decades to come.”

Dr. David Wilkes, executive associate dean for research affairs at the IU School of Medicine, will direct the Indiana Physician Scientist Initiative. Its specific goals include:

— Recruiting 20 top physician scientists to the IU School of Medicine with an investment of $37.5 million. Their expected focus will be on cancer, neurosciences and diabetes/vascular disease.

— Training the next generation of physician-researchers by strengthening IU’s Medical Scientist Training Program with a $10 million investment.

— Underwriting Indiana Biobank with $6 million for the storage of biological samples that provide genetic and other information for biomedical research. Another $2 million will go to specialists who focus on managing Biobank data.

— Spending $2 million to expand the IU School of Medicine’s international programs in Kenya, Mexico, Honduras and China.

— Investing $2 million in ITRAC, a program that works with scientists to map the steps to take a scientific discovery from the lab to human testing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT