A 'bounce house' to rule them all

June 19, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
This has to be the coolest use of warehouse space yet. Bounce HouseA Fishers company called BounceZone has leased 12,000 square feet northwest of 146th Street and Cumberland Road in Noblesville with plans for a unique amusement center. They're installing 14 bounce inflatables, along with arcade games and a concession stand. The facility will be available by appointment and for parties and is slated to open Aug. 1. Janae Ledbetter, the owner and president, previously ran a daycare. "It's a full service party place for kids," she said. While their kids have fun, parents can visit other nearby businesses including a fitness trainer, chiropractor and an insurance adjuster.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Sounds like what Discovery Zone used to be only on CRACK. Can adults sign up as well. I think it would be a good corporate team building event.
  • yeah... I want to play in a bounce house! Why do the kids get all the fun stuff?
  • Just fill the kids up with Mountain Dew Code Red and they'll be bouncing off the walls without any need to brave the congestion in CarNoblesField.
  • Figures they'd put it in Fishers -- need something to keep the soccer moms occupied.
  • This type of business is actually quite popular in many other locations in the U.S. I have friends in other states who love them. It's another nice option for those who want to have their childrens' birthday parties somewhere besides home. And I also hear they do a good business in the winter because it's a great place to take kids to burn off some energy.

    I'm actually happy to see something unique like this come to the area. It seems that Fishers and Noblesville are simply full of lots of me too businesses.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So, Pence wants the federal government to ignore the 2008 law that allows children from these countries to argue for asylum in front of a judge. How did this guy become governor? And how is that we'll soon be subjected to repeatedly seeing him on TV being taken seriously as a presidential candidate? Am I in Bizzaro-U.S.A.?

  2. "And the most rigorous studies of one-year preschool programs have shown short-term benefits that fade out in a few years or no benefits at all." So we are going down a path that seems to have proven not to work very well. Right intention, wrong approach?

  3. Well for Dunkin Donuts it might say that even a highly popular outlet can't make a poorly sited location work. That little strip has seen near constant churn for years.

  4. Years ago, the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device companies shifted their research investment away from Medical Institutions to focus more on private research centers, primarily because of medical institution inefficiencies in initiating clinical studies and their inability/commitment to enroll the needed number of patients in these studies. The protracted timelines of the medical institutions were prompting significant delays in the availability of new drug and medical device entities for patients and relatedly, higher R and D expenditures to the commercial industry because of these delays. While the above stated IU Health "ratio is about $2.50 in federal funding for every $1 in industry funding", the available funding is REVERSED as commercial R and D (primarily Phase I-IV clinical work)runs $2.50 to $1 for available federal funding ($76.8B to $30.9B in 2011). The above article significatly understated the available R and D funding from industry......see the Pharma and Medical Device industry websites. Clearly, if medical institutions like IU Health wish to attract more commercial studies, they will need to become more competitive with private clinical sites in their ability to be more efficient and in their commitment to meet study enrollment goals on time. Lastly, to the reference to the above Washington Post article headlined “As drug industry’s influence over research grows, so does the potential for bias", lacks some credibility as both FDA and Institutional Institutional Review Boards must approve the high proportion of these studies before studies are started. This means that both study safety and science must be approved by both entities.

  5. ChIeF and all the other critics – better is better no matter what. Get over it; they are doing better despite you ?

ADVERTISEMENT