ADELOWO: Adding greens, prints and other wardrobe pick-me-ups

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For most people, a first “real” professional outfit wasn’t unique. Men chose from a black, gray or navy suit, paired with a white dress shirt. Shoes? Black. Tie? Red or navy.

Women had a wider range of bland options, including a black or gray suit, with a knee-length skirt … or perhaps slacks, all tied together with a white blouse. Accessories were understated and the purse—black or brown.

While these are great places to start, your style and fashion choices shouldn’t end here. But, for many, they do. In spite of the abundant wonderful options, professionals often express a high level of pride in not buying clothes. This pride of not spending money is often combined with the expectation that others should accept the “real you.” “I do good work. Why should people care what I wear? Why do I need to dress up?”

Listen, I know where you’re coming from. We all know good people raised by good parents who worked hard to provide “good clothes” … for church, synagogue, school, and an occasional wedding or family reunion. But fashion doesn’t mean wearing a costume that disguises you. When fashion works, it allows the real you to be expressed in all your evolving glory. Why let yourself be hidden by the non-expressive clothes, fashions and style you’ve simply outgrown?

Fashion is a means of self-expression—like music or cooking. Don’t tell me who you are; show me. Use fashion to let the world see who you are inside.

Here’s my challenge to you: Pick two trends and begin to incorporate them subtly into your wardrobe.

Start with these fall fashion trends and show the world your uniqueness:

1. Shades of green. The deeper the green, the more it exudes warmth and compassion. Think evergreen which, like navy, also exudes stability. Consider a patterned dress shirt, blouse, sports coat or jacket with dominant shades of deep green.

2. Prints with a modern twist. Men: This will be easy—it’s all in the tie. Ladies: Consider the unusual-patterned shirts, with unexpected twists on traditional prints like chevron, paisley, plaid, checks or florals. A simple addition can exude sophistication and create intrigue. Pair your print with a solid skirt or vice versa.

3. Smart jackets. A tweed jacket might remind you of a college professor, which is why they convey intelligence and approachability. Next to your formal solid-colored suit, a complimentary tweed jacket will be your next-best buy ever. No matter where you work, there’s a time you’ll need to look smart and friendly.

4. Leather accents. Leather often implies the tough guy or bad girl—it’s edgy. But edgy can appear refined and modern, too. Consider a jacket with a leather trim on the pockets, lapel or buttons. A touch of leather adds polish, communicates strength, and appears creative.

Look at fashion trends as another tool in your professional toolkit that allows others to see you are evolving and growing. Like any other tool, there’s a right time and right place for their use.

If you’re in doubt, I’d love to hear from you.•


Adelowo is the founder of ImageCube LLC (www.imagecubellc.com), and a certified image consultant of the Association of Image Consultants International. She can be reached at sadelowo@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...