'Adventureland': Your thoughts

March 31, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
If you attended the screening Tuesday night, please post your comments.

Sorry I missed it. Well, not sorry. I was at the American Cabaret Theatre relaunch concert. Should I go out of my way to see "Adventureland" when it hits theaters?

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Just okay. I was excited about the movie being set in 1987 (a very good year for me!). I couldn't wait to hear some 80's music, see some big 80's hair and see a little neon and flower power fashion. I was only satisfied with the music. The hair wasn't big enough and the wardrobe was lacking.

    The bright spot in the movie was Matt Bush (before this I knew him only from AT&T's rollover minutes commercials!) as the annoying neighbor/former friend of the main character. With the several known actors in this movie, he was the only one that was memorable to me.

    Bill Hadar and Kristen Wiig did okay with what they were given...they rarely disappoint, but a cardboard cutout of Ryan Reynolds could've done as well as he did. I don't know the boy who played the main character...nor do I care enough to find out. And Kristen Stewart??? My main complaint about Twilight was that Kristen Stewart cannot act. As a matter of fact, I thought she was so bad it was distracting. My opinion of her talent hasn't changed after seeing Adventureland. Although, she's certainly not solely to blame for this movie's flaws...she doesn't help matters.

    I don't think Adventureland will do well in theaters. It's just not funny enough.
  • While the movie was certainly entertaining, it left me feeling pretty depressed. There were more than enough comedic moments, but the overall cinematography, awkward moments and the 1987 date really brought the movie down. On top of that, it painted Pittsburgh as a city which no one would really want to visit let alone live in.

    However, overall, the movie was well done. I do believe it was the intent of the director and producer to create this drab post-undergrad existence regardless of the actual point of the movie, the prevailing lovestory.
  • I was actually pleasantly surprised. How much I like a movie is often colored by whether I think I'll like it before I step into the theater. In this way, it exceeded my expectations. I feared it to be an over-the-top American Pie type of experience. I was actually relieved that they played it pretty straight, with some nice and really funny moments. And I was REALLY relieved that Ryan Reynold's character was played straight.

    I think they captured the awkwardness of love and life at that age much more authentically than many other films in that vein.

    The soundtrack, and the 80s nostalgia was fun as well.

    Lou, I think you might like this one.
  • I left the movie underwhelmed. I think I expected more comedy and less drama. I usually enjoy these kinds of movies, more a slice of life than plot driven, but I never connected to any of the characters. I didn't think the acting was great (especially Kristen Stewart) and left thinking the main character must have been written for Michael Cera, because he acted like every character Michael Cera has ever played.

    I enjoyed the fact the city was set in Pittsburgh because I'm familiar with the town and been to Kennywood many times, the amusement park used in the film.
  • I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. Having been in my early 20s in 1987, I could really relate to the summer love and trying figure out what my next step in life would be. Jesse Eisenberg and Kristen Stewart were delightful. I could really connect with a little bit of each character - the party girl Lisa, the ditzy Paulette, the closet-intellectual Joel... It really took me back.

    I wasn't expecting lots of laughs, didn't really know what to expect, but was quite pleased with movie overall. If you're looking for an adverture movie or slapstick comedy, this isn't the movie for you. If you want some summer romance with retro visuals (get aload of the Pacer and Chevelle!), then you should definately see this movie.
  • Adventureland is a gentle reminder that your early jobs rarely come
    with challenging assignments or responsibilities or any sense of true
    purpose. What those jobs do is help smooth some of your rough
    edges, expose you to myriad personalities and present experiences
    that help define whomever you may, or may not, become.
    I liked the movie. Go see it. The film will give you pause to remember
    why you loved or hated or maybe even miss - your first big summer
    job.
  • I liked it. It was less American Pie and more Garden State.

    The only actors that I knew going in were Kristen Wiig, Bill Hadar, and Ryan Reynolds. Knowing absolutely nothing about the rest of the actors, I thought they did well. Kristen Stewart's character reminded me exactly of someone from college (early 90s), and the rest seemed to fit that area as I remember. Ryan Reynolds didn't fit at all; he didn't look, sound, or act believable to that period. The entire story could have been about the Wiig and Hadar characters, and I would have been fine. Pirate bananas make me laugh.
  • Thanks to everyone for your thoughts and reviews. I (like Lou) am trying to decide whether or not it's worth the time and the money to attend. This film has special appeal for me, as I spent one very long summer in the 1980s performing in a couple of lame, 30 minute revues at an amusement park called -- wait for it -- Adventureland (!?) just outside of Des Moines, IA. And based upon viewing trailers, had actually wondered if filming was done at our old park.

    But even though this was filmed in Pittsburgh, I'm guessing the storylines are very similar to what we experienced back in the day.

    So. Maybe I will check this one out. But I will keep expectations low.
  • I think it's one of those films it's OK to like for no good reason other than you lived in the 80s.

    Pre-viewing I imagined a 2D slapstick comedy bound for Not Another Teen Movie fame, but as I told my friend as we exited the theater, it was about as deep as a kiddy pool and that was deep enough.

    I was charmed by it, and by-golly those pirate bananas were funny
  • The next time I run out of eyes to put on stuffed banana toys, I will remember that more eyes are not necessarily the answer. A patch will turn a silly stuffed toy into a funny stuffed banana pirate. A lesson to remember in the corporate world.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT