Allison Transmission seeks $522M in initial public offering

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Allison Transmission Holdings Inc., the former parts unit of General Motors Co., is seeking to raise as much as $522 million for its private-equity owners in a U.S. initial public offering.

The Indianapolis-based company is offering 21.7 million shares for $22 to $24 apiece on behalf of Carlyle Group and Onex Corp., according to a filing Wednesday with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and won’t receive any proceeds. Allison filed with the SEC initially last March for a $750 million IPO.

Allison is one of at least seven companies that have scheduled U.S. IPOs in the next month after the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index reached its highest level since 2008, signaling that improving economic prospects have stoked investor appetite. The offering is expected to price during the week of March 12, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The midpoint of the price range would value Allison common stock at about $4.2 billion, the filing shows. The company has about $3.4 billion of debt. Washington, D.C.-based Carlyle and Onex of Toronto bought Allison from General Motors for $5.6 billion in 2007. Carlyle and Onex are trimming their respective stakes in Allison to 44 percent from 50 percent.

Sales at the maker of automatic transmissions for highway trucks, military vehicles and mining equipment increased 12 percent, to $2.2 billion, in the year ended Dec. 31, while net income more than tripled to $103 million, according to the prospectus.

The company plans to list its shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ALSN. Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. are leading the offering.

Allison dominates the U.S. market in the sale of automatic transmissions in categories such as firetrucks, school buses and garbage trucks.

Last April, the company said it planned to invest $89 million to grow its headquarters and manufacturing operations in Speedway, creating as many as 205 jobs by 2013. The company has about 2,500 employees in Indianapolis.

The company was founded in 1915 by Jim Allison, one of the original four founders of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway.


  • Disagree
    BttB90, my apologies, my initial comment came off as rude, and I was only intending to be sarcastic, but not offensive.

    I disagree completely. In the case of Chrysler and GM, you saw a steady degredation of their financials over a long period of time. I do agree that a drastic part of the decline you saw was that they simply paid their workers too much and the benefit costs were far too high. The pension and other continuing benefits was the straw that broke the camel's back. In the case of GM and Chrysler, they were competing in a market with significantly more players that the number of players in the automatic transmission manufacturing market. The barriers to entry are significantly higher and their are fewer (or nonexistant) competitors. With high barriers to entry, a unique product offering, long-term customer relationships, and few direct competitors, how could you expect the business to suddenly succumb to high labor costs and teeter on the brink of bankruptcy? It just isn't going to happen. Unlike Chrysler and GM, Allison's financials have continued to strengthen, all while using a significant majority of their free cash flow to pay down debt at an extraordinary rate. You can also see their payroll and benefit costs have been significantly reducing as older UAW members retire. I think you need to do a more thorough review of the company's financials rather than making broad generalized comments that clearly have no basis. If you don't like the UAW or unions in general, Allison shouldn't be the target of your baseless, and quite frankly, very incorrect, remarks.
  • Great Insight is Narrow Sighted
    Just as with GM and Chrystler the initial margins look good but with the curve soaring upwards with the high cost of union labor it will soon pass the profit curve and rely on either government handouts or lossess that will be directly born by the stockholders. The only way for long term success is to become inependant of the unions.
    • Great Insight
      BttB90 clearly knows what he is talking about, and everyone should listen to his sound financial advice. Last year, in a dismal economy, this company only managed to increase it's sales by 12%, which were clearly their highest margin products, because net income tripled from the prior year. In four years the business shed almost 40% of the debt used to buy the business from GM. Keep in mind this was during the worst recession many of us have experienced. The proposed IPO would further reduce the remaining debt by at least 15%. Oh, and I can tell a lot of analysis went into BttB90's analysis of profits by segment to use government business as a cornerstone of his argument. Clearly this is an awful investment option for potential investors. Or, BttB90 is an idiot. Take your pick.
      • Allison and Investment
        Isnt it hard to seriously invest in a company that has so much debt, military spending is being cut, and is bound by the whims and desires of the UAW and other unions. Bad investment when the government can bail out the unions and leave the stockholders high and dry. Smells like a GM patterned business venture.

        Post a comment to this story

        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

        2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

        3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

        4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

        5. Oh wait. Never mind.