An all-black “Cat” on Broadway

February 12, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Tonight, a new production of “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” begins performances on Broadway with a high-profile cast, including Terrence Howard, Phylicia Rashad and James Earl Jones.

Obviously this isn’t the cast that Tennessee Williams had in mind when the play was first produced in 1955.

In fact, it marks the first time that a black cast has tackled the show on Broadway.

There is, of course, precedent for such ethnic recasting. Think the Pearl Bailey revival of “Hello, Dolly” or the Robert Guillaume take on “Guys and Dolls” in the ’70s, for instance. Plays such as “The Gin Game” and “The Odd Couple” have proven their universality as well.

What may make “Cat” different, though, is that it takes place in a specific time and place and culture (the Deep South in the 1950s) that matter to what one thinks of the characters. To cite a specific example, the Big Daddy character (played by Jones) uses the n-word. That can’t help but resonate differently—and carry different meaning—than in previous productions.

I’ll talk about the issue of color-blind casting in later blogs (the idea of casting the best actor available regardless of race and historically reality). For now, I’m interested in “Cat” and such productions as the National Asian American Theatre Company’s “Our Town.”

It feels absurd to imagine the plays of August Wilson (his “The Piano Lesson” opens soon at the IRT) ever being done with all-white casts. But I wouldn’t be surprised if “The Wiz”—celebrated as an all-black “The Wizard of Oz”—will be ethnically mixed when it’s staged at American Cabaret Theatre this summer.

So when, in theater, does race matter? Is such casting a violation of the playwright’s intent? Or is that irrelevant?

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Bravo! What a splendid cast for such a superb play! I've never thought of plays as being all white or all black or all anything. A definite plus to an all-African American audience is that it might draw new folks to the joys and wonders of live theater who might have never attended otherwise. I am caucasian and I would love to see this play with this cast.
  • Race should be considered only when or if the ethnicity would detract from the
    content. Imagine a white or Asian Jim in BIg River.......

    We're slow, but many theatres are trying to cast 'color-blind'.

    I'd like to see this show. I don't know whether James Earl Jones can really
    act. The reason is that all I can do is listen to that voice! Can't see
    Phylicia Rashad as Big Momma because she's such a strong personality, but she's
    probably good. hmmmm...some thought provokin' going on here, Lou! Thanks.
  • I am so excited for this production! Terrence Howard and James Earl Jones speaking Tennessee Williams' words - it can only be brilliant. I wish I was due to be in NYC over it's run.

    Why is it absurb to imagine an all-white cast of Piano Lesson? It might be fascinating to project different issues as opposed to race..what of class or maybe even sexuality? Good actors can make any production compelling and different race casting - can add a new twist to an interpretation. The NAAT production of Our Town sounds intriguing, too.

    Can we convince any of these theatre companies to tour? I would love to see both of those.
  • Unfortunately, touring drams are rare these days. Twelve Angry Men is part of the Broadway series this year, but can anyone remember the last time it featured a non-musical?

    FYI: The Acting Company--recently praised in the Wall Street Journal--is touring with two shows in rep: The Tempest and Moby-Dick--Rehearsed and will be coming through Indiana, stopping at Ball State and IU. Should be worth a roadtrip.
  • More on the subject from Sunday's New York Times.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/24/theater/24simo.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT