Anthem loses disclosure fight

November 21, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
The Blue Cross and Blue Shield plan that Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. operates in Connecticut has backed out of managing part of an insurance program rather than disclose the rates it pays doctors and its approach to denying prescription drug payments. Did WellPoint make the right call? How deep should government dig into a companyâ??s internal operations?
  • Well, how can consumerism take place in an industry where the consumer doesn't know the costs? The insurance companies nor the doctors offices aren't talking, so I guess it does take a third party to force disclosure.
  • I think it's great that the government is finally stepping in and putting it's arms around what these insurance companies are doing. I hope this is the beginning of a huge ripple effect that will be seen throughout the country.
  • This has played out as it should in this instance. All of us who contract with government entities to provide services know on the front end due to regulations in place that the federal government has the right to inspect our books and records in our fees meet a certain threshold. The government has made this information a requirement of the contract and since Wellpoint has refused, they are excluded from the contract. That is how it should be.
  • Full disclosure is something most companies do not like. First, it would require honesty in their dealings with Customers. Second, it would allow more competition in an industry that thrives within the Gray Boundaries of complex legal and contracts language. The disclosure rules will be challenged and battled in courts where lawyers will keep both sides fighting to line their pockets while poor consumers foot the bills in the form of higher rates. Take a close look at the pay for most CEO level people in this industry - it's simply sinful.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.