IBJNews

  • Home

Area home-sale deals rise for 17th straight month

 IBJ Staff
October 15, 2012
Keywords
F.C. Tucker, Home Sales, Real Estate & Retail, Residential Real Estate
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Home-sale agreements in the nine-county Indianapolis area rose 3.8 percent in September, the 17th consecutive month of improvement in sales contracts.

The gains were concentrated in Hamilton, Madison and Shelby counties, Indianapolis-based real estate agency F.C. Tucker Co. said Monday. Sales actually fell in four out of the nine counties, including Marion, Morgan and Johnson. 

Purchase agreements for existing homes totaled 1,788 homes for September, up 66 homes from September 2011. Madison County led the way, with a jump from 86 pending sales to 126. Hamilton County had 372 pending sales, up 13.4 percent from the same month in 2011.

Sales agreements dropped 1.6 percent in Marion County, from 773 to 761.

Recent home-sale figures still pale in comparision to pre-recession numbers. More than 2,400 homes were sold in the area in September 2006, about 34 percent more than last month.

Year-to-date, home sales in the area have risen 14.6 percent. Average sale prices for the year also have risen, 2.2 percent, to $155,987. The only county to record a decline in average sale price this year is Hamilton, down 1.9 percent, to $239,920.

Meantime, the inventory of available homes is falling fast. There were 12,727 existing homes available on the market in September, down 2,132 from September 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT