IBJNews

Indiana charter school backers fret about losing movement's edge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Alarm bells went off among Mayor Greg Ballard’s staff Dec. 3 when Virginia-based Imagine Schools issued an arcane press release announcing its Imagine-West charter school in Indianapolis would be overseen by Trine University rather than by Ball State University.

To the mayor’s staff, the shift in “charter authorizer” was a way for Imagine-West to duck accountability that sets dangerous precedent that could lead to lower-performing charter schools across the state.

“True accountability is necessary for the sustainability of education reform,” said Jason Kloth, Ballard’s deputy mayor for education.

charterFor all the controversy around them, charter schools in Indiana have posted better student performance than their peers in most other states, according to state-by-state analysis by Stanford University.

The key reason, Stanford’s researchers said, is that the entities that authorize charter schools have done a better job of not letting bad schools open in the first place and, when necessary, closing poor-performing schools.

That credit falls mostly to the Indianapolis mayor, who oversees 25 K-12 charter schools, most of which are performing well. The performance of schools approved by Ball State has been mixed, but the university has been trying to clean up its portfolio by closing the worst of the bunch.

That is, after all, the basic bargain of charter schools: The privately run, but publicly funded entities are given freedom from some state regulations in exchange for stronger accountability; in other words, they can be closed down by their authorizer.

In theory. In practice, poor-performing charter schools are finding ways to live on. Of the seven schools Ball State marked for closure in January last year, four are still operating, either as charter schools or as private schools accepting public vouchers.

The trend threatens to erase the performance edge Indiana’s charter schools have enjoyed over their public and charter school

peers in other states, according to David Harris, CEO of The Mind Trust, an education reform group based in Indianapolis.

“I’m worried that we’re going to have bad schools operating. I’m also worried about it damaging the brand of charters in Indianapolis,” said Harris, who was Indianapolis’ first director of charter schools after such schools were legalized by the Legislature in 2001.

Few authorizers

Indiana was late to the charter school movement, becoming the 37th state to allow them. It now has eight charter authorizers.

Many states that adopted charter schools earlier allowed the number of authorizers to rise rapidly. In Minnesota, the number shot to 50 before the state cut it by about half.

Ohio has 66 authorizers. And because those organizations are mostly financed by fees paid by the schools they authorize, they compete with one another to authorize as many schools as possible.

Among Ohio’s charter schools, students actually perform worse than their traditional public school peers, according to the Stanford research.

But in Indiana, charter schools improved students’ reading ability faster than charters in all but five of the 27 states studied. On math, Indiana charter schools advanced learning faster than charter schools in all but 11 other states studied.

“The overall picture of charter school effectiveness remains positive across Indiana and in particular in Indianapolis,” said Macke Raymond, director of Stanford’s Center for Research and Education Outcomes, which released the research in December 2012.

However, different authorizers can put up strikingly different results.

Before Ball State started to purge poor-performing schools from its portfolio, just 10 percent of its schools were performing significantly better in reading than the traditional public school districts in which they were located, according to the study. On math, just 16 percent of Ball State’s charter schools were performing better than their traditional school peers.

By contrast, the study found that 37 percent of the charter schools approved by the Indianapolis mayor’s office were performing significantly better than their peers in both math and reading.

Also, the mayor’s charter schools outperformed Ball State’s schools by a wide margin over their traditional public school peers in both reading and math.

“While there are solid proportions of charter schools outperforming their local district schools, there are also some changes in the distribution of quality across schools that warrant careful attention,” Raymond said.

Protests of fairness

Some organizations that run charter schools complain that Ballard’s charter schools office fails to acknowledge when schools have taken on challenging groups of students and helped them improve.

Leaders of the schools Ballard has tried to close—Fountain Square Academy in 2011 and The Project School in 2012—both accused the mayor of focusing too much on how many kids pass the state standardized tests, rather than on how many more of a school’s students pass than when the school opened.

Now Imagine Schools says the Mayor’s Office, which has no direct authority over Imagine-West, is making the same mistake.

Imagine-West, founded in 2009, has 624 students in grades K-8. In that first year, just 38 percent of Imagine-West’s students passed the state standardized ISTEP test in math and only 49 percent passed in reading.

But last year, those pass rates had surged to 61 percent in math and 58 percent in reading.

“Our test scores have improved every year,” said Amy Butke, Imagine’s executive vice president for Ohio and Indiana. “I would just hope that they look at all the data before they start making accusations.”

Kloth, however, noted the Stanford findings that charter schools that start poorly almost never catch up—despite what their organizers say. He contends Imagine-West is not on a trajectory to reach the standards his office would expect.

Besides, he noted, it’s hard to argue for Imagine-West to keep operating when it sits directly across the street from one of the highest-performing public schools in the city, Indianapolis Public Schools’ Carl Wilde Elementary School.

“We actually have to live up to the promise of school choice,” Kloth said, “and if we don’t, what differentiates charter schools from any other public schools?”

Ball State cracks down

Bob Marra, Ball State’s director of charter schools, agrees the poor-performing schools need to be closed.

“While I understand it may cause some short-term difficulty for families, it is a decision made in the long-term best interests of their students,” Marra said.

And there is a clear performance difference when Imagine-West and the seven charter schools Ball State tried to close last year are stacked up against all other charter schools.

At the eight poor-performing schools, about 57 percent of elementary and middle-school students passed the math or English portion of the state standardized ISTEP test in spring 2013. Among all other charter schools statewide, 69 percent of elementary and middle school students passed math or English.

The schools Ball State tried to close are even inferior to the traditional public schools that would otherwise be educating the charter schools’ students.

At Charter School of the Dunes in Gary, 42 percent passed the ISTEP test compared with 46 percent at Gary Community School Corp.

At Imagine-East charter school in Indianapolis, 33 percent passed versus 48 percent at Lawrence Township schools.

At Fort Wayne Community Schools, 67 percent passed the ISTEP test, but the pass rates were just 52 percent at the Imagine MASTer Academy charter school and just 37 percent at a second Imagine charter school there. The Timothy L. Johnson Academy, another charter school in Fort Wayne, posted pass rates of 41 percent.

Imagine converted its two charter schools in Fort Wayne—which Ball State moved to close down—into private schools, and now accepts taxpayer-funded vouchers.

Butke denied Imagine switched Imagine-West to Trine to avoid having Ball state close the school.

“The law gives you the opportunity,” she said. “If you can find a partner out there that better suits their mission, why wouldn’t you?”

Trine, based in Angola, is a private university started in 1884 as a teacher’s college. It also approved a new charter for one of the seven schools Ball State tried to close, the Timothy L. Johnson Academy.

Trine officials did not return a phone call seeking comment. However, in the press release announcing Trine’s authorization of Imagine-West, David Woods, Trine’s director of charter school operations, said the decision was based on Imagine’s desire to expand its use of technology and to add a high school to its K-8 school.

“There is a commitment to strategic growth that increases academic rigor, which aligns with our objectives for innovative education,” he said. “We believe it is a partnership that is good for students and good for the community.”

State legislation

Ironically, the problem that charter proponents like Kloth and Harris now fight was created by charter proponents in the Legislature.

Private universities like Trine were given authority to authorize charter schools in 2011 as part of a sweeping package of education reforms championed by then-Gov. Mitch Daniels, then-state schools chief Tony Bennett and the Republican-controlled Legislature.

Lawmakers thought that by giving private colleges authority to approve charter schools, they could increase the number of charters throughout the state. Toward that goal, the Legislature made state government a charter authorizer, too, via an entity called the Indiana Charter School Board.

The goal of both measures—as well as of a program of private school vouchers approved that year—was to extend more school choices to more parents throughout the state, according to Ryan Streeter, the head of Gov. Mike Pence’s policy team.

“With more charters, parents have an even wider choice among many options,” Streeter wrote in a June 2013 article published by Sagamore Institute for Public Policy, an Indianapolis-based think tank that supports education reform. “These reforms ultimately produce a vibrant marketplace aimed at disrupting the public school system’s monopoly.”

Expanding the option of charter schools was a bit more difficult before. Charter schools that wanted to operate outside of Indianapolis really had only one option for getting authorized: Ball State.

Even though every public university had been given authority to approve charter schools, only Ball State did so. Also, every public school district in the state has authority to approve charter schools, but only two have done so.

Since the 2011 legislation, three private colleges have started to approve charter schools: Trine, Grace College in Winona Lake, and Calumet College of St. Joseph in Gary.

Only Grace has approved an entirely new school. Calumet College’s only charter approval was for the Charter School of the Dunes—one of the schools Ball State was trying to close.

Among the new charter authorizers created since 2011, only the Indiana Charter School Board has approved a significant number of new schools. It has OK’d nine charter schools serving K-12 students.

In 2013, lawmakers tried to prevent charter schools from switching to a new charter authorizer to avoid being closed down. They passed House Bill 1338, which requires a hearing before the State Board of Education whenever a charter authorizer decided to extend the life of a school that another authorizer decided to close.

But the case of Imagine-West appears to skirt that law because Ball State had not told Imagine-West, either formally or informally, that it would be closed.

However, Butke acknowledged that Ball State’s attempt to close three other Imagine schools last year made the future of Imagine-West uncertain.

“There’s always uncertainty when things aren’t specifically laid out,” she said, hinting that Trine has made its expectations for the school clearer than Ball State did.

Harris, of The Mind Trust, said making state government a charter authorizer was a sensible way to get more charters throughout the state. Beyond that, he said, there was no need to create more authorizers.

“We’re solving a problem that did not exist,” Harris said, noting that Indiana’s authorizers could approve far more schools, but there has been a shortage of high-quality applicants.

“In so doing,” he added, “we’ve moved away from the lessons that the entire country has learned.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • fact error
    The articles states, "Also, every public school district in the state has authority to approve charter schools, but only two have done so." In 2002 and 2003 The Carmel Clay Schools Board of Education authorized Options Charter School - Carmel. The authorization of that school was cooperatively transferred to Ball State University in 2004. I'm assuming this omission was made because the school is no longer authorized by a school board. I make this comment because when a local school board has the courage to open a charter school option for its students, it should remain part of the important historical record of education reform.
  • School Choice Is Not School Reform
    If a charter is closed, the relatively and collectively poorer performing students have to go somewhere and presumably will adversely affect the scores of the schools they transfer to. In addition, closing a school is disruptive to both families, students, and teachers. Lets get focused on good public school that are accountable. I would like to see Indiana follow the model of Finland, which, as a country, attracts and rewards good high school students that go into public education. Unfortunately, the teaching profession is relatively low paying and not seen as a desirable and rewarding profession to college students. There are a host of other factors that affect student performance other than school choice. Our family saw first-hand how poorly the Imagine-West charter was doing and moved one of our children to another school.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

ADVERTISEMENT