IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Lurie-ing arts audiences to downtown Carmel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

This week, thoughts on exhibitions at Evan Lurie Gallery in Carmel and a new revue at the Cabaret at the Connoisseur Room.

__________

I don’t see myself as an arts snob. My taste ranges wide, and I’m just as likely to be frustrated by pompous artspeak as I am to be charmed by the simple and unpretentious.

But I have to admit that I cringe when walking down Carmel’s Art & Design District because of the J. Seward Johnson Jr. sculptures scattered along the otherwise lovely street. Whether it’s “Holding Out” (featuring a woman hauling grocery bags) or “Unconditional Surrender” (a bastardization of the famed WWII sailor-kisses-nurse photo), the fact that these are permanent parts of the streetscape create an uphill battle for those trying to make Carmel an interesting arts and design destination.

Walter Knabe’s “Sincerity, Illuminated” combines his recurring elements in interesting ways. (Photo Courtesy Walter Knabe)

Suffer through the gauntlet of Normal Rockwell-wannabees, though, and there are rewards in Carmel. Case in point: the shows currently running at Evan Lurie Gallery.

The headliner is Walter Knabe, a local arts legend best known for his original wallpaper. His show of recent work, “A Shift in the Paradigm” (through Dec. 5), features large canvases where recurring images (a dancing bear and rabbit, Asian figures) are often splashed with abstract splotches, making the artist himself a constant presence. There’s a mythological component to much of the work, most successfully pulled off in “Sincerity, Illuminated,” which includes the aforementioned bear and rabbit along with a reclining nude and six rose-ish swirls. You can feel the fusion of time and memory.

Although there are no overt connections, Knabe’s work fits nicely with that of other artists still featured in the gallery from past shows. Like Knabe, Peter Drake has worked of late on a large scale, offering oversized images of decaying toys that somehow hold their dignity. In “Parade,” a marching trombonist toy is accompanied by a pack of dogs, oblivious to the fire raging past the green lawn behind it.

Also on display on my visit (go soon and you may be able to see them before they are shipped off), were L’Oriano Galloni’s long-limbed figure sculptures and Ted Gall’s intense, sad bronzes. With particular impact: the haunting “Arrivals-Departures” depicting an aged would-be angel with strapped-on wings and a stray fallen feather.

__________

Most theatrical musical revues are built on pre-existing, repurposed material.

For instance, “Side by Side by Sondheim,” a touchstone in the genre, took tunes from the then-underappreciated songwriter and presented them in a new way. Similarly, “The World Goes Round” lifted Kander and Ebb songs and gave them new spins.

Sometimes, a revue of new or totally unfamiliar material will come around and achieve some level of success—I’m thinking of Jason Robert Brown’s “Songs for a New World”—but they are few and far between.

Why?

Because original revues are deceptively difficult to create. The lesser-known the songs, the stronger a first impression those songs have to make.

Even if a composer has a quality song list, there’s more to consider. A through-line (overt or not), characters (overt or not) and structure (overt or not) are often necessary to turn a set of songs into a satisfying evening.

Why am I going on about the difficulty of creating a musical revue? Because it pains me to report that “Enter Love,” a revue of songs by Lynn L. Lupold, didn’t rise to the very large challenge. (It premiered at the Cabaret at the Connoisseur Room Nov. 6-7.)

Presented under the Composer’s Stage Project moniker—a series I sincerely hope continues—“Enter Love” started with an awkward “Just for Tonight” (songwriters should just stop trying to generically pump up an audience) followed by an unfocused, gimmick song “Babbling Voices.” The show progressed from number to number without insight or wit and only rarely with an emotional connection. Verse three seemed no further along an emotional or humorous arc than verse one, and no overall vision emerged. Vagueness about the core theme wouldn’t have been a problem, though, if the songs had been individually or collectively stronger.

Cast highlights Deb Mullins, Ronald Hellems and Shannon Forsell tried gamely to inject passion into the work. But as song after song failed to build, I found myself shifting into “foreign language” mode—trying to distance myself from the words and, instead, hear pure sound. In that difficult-to-sustain mode (and with outstanding support from musical director David Duncan and his trio), the songs were far more engaging, leading me to conclude that Lupold the lyricist may be getting in the way of Lupold the composer. Or that more attention should be focused on the former as the revue continues to evolve.•

__________

Visit ibj.com/arts for additional reviews, previews and arts discussion. Twitter: IBJarts

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I can't stand those awful "sculptures" in Carmel either.
    I'm so glad to see that someone else is feeling the same pain. I am a Herron graduate, too, so the fact that someone chose to install such horrid "sculptures", and so many of them by the same bad artist, really hurts me.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT