IBJOpinion

WIEGAND: School competition good for community

Kurt Wiegand
December 5, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Public Schools recently held its annual Magnet Fair, as it does each November. The fair highlights the magnet programs and option schools within IPS. This year, IPS announced it’s adding programs and schools, including more Montessori and Center for Inquiry sites over the next two years.

For IPS, it’s a clear bid to hold on to students. For decades, IPS has seen families—particularly middle-class families—leaving both the neighborhoods and the school district. The loss resulted in many school closings, constant redistricting and precluded much-needed investment in school infrastructure. More recently, with white flight subsiding and the end of court-ordered busing, it appeared enrollment would stabilize and allow IPS to finally invest in its buildings. Now, in addition to its own shortcomings, the new challenge to IPS enrollment is charter schools.

It’s vitally important to have innovative, competitive and successful school options available to attract and retain middle-class families in the neighborhoods. For groups that feel disenfranchised, anti-poverty organizations, those concerned about crime, and groups concerned about economic competitiveness, there’s no antidote as effective as education and future orientation (two of the hallmarks of the middle class). Likewise, there’s no prescription for failure, poverty, crime and disinvestment in urban neighborhoods like the 47-percent overall graduation rate IPS had last year.

For too long, there’s been a debate about whether the quality of the schools or the quality of the students and their families are to blame for the poor performance at IPS. That debate usually deteriorates to platitudes and entrenched political positions and, more important, leaves us with no way forward. What’s more, the constant, almost knee-jerk, condemnation of IPS has only served to help send concerned families packing for the suburbs and exacerbating problems, such as abandoned homes in our neighborhoods.

Meanwhile, it seems the best-kept secret is that IPS schools like Montessori schools 56 and 91 as well as the Center for Inquiry are outperforming the state average, many charter schools, and even some private schools in Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress results, while offering innovative programs like the International Baccalaureate program. They are achieving this performance with a high percentage of minorities as well as students from households that qualify for free or reduced lunch. For everyone concerned, the IPS magnet and option program is a proven way forward.

The solution to IPS enrollment problems isn’t a moratorium on charter schools. Charter schools have given frustrated families a compelling choice other than a moving van. But what charter schools have also done—particularly with Dr. Eugene White in charge of IPS—is spur competition. The innovation and performance represented by the IPS magnet and option program is one result of that competition. It’s a clear indication that competition is good for the schools, good for the students, and good for the neighborhoods.

IPS has a problem—both in perception and reality—of an underperforming school district and declining enrollment. The city has a problem with the loss of middle-class families and disinvestment in the neighborhoods. A high-quality magnet and option school program can help turn both problems around. The strategy to compete for students is a strategy that should be encouraged, supported and accelerated. That said, IPS must be careful that it doesn’t stretch its resources too thin. Maintaining the top-notch quality of these programs is essential.

Business, community and city leaders should encourage the expansion and replication of high-quality schools and healthy school competition—as well as recognize and promote success wherever it’s found.•

__________

Wiegand is information technology director for a local company. He sits on the steering committee for the Emerson Avenue Corridor Gateway Project and is active in his Emerson Heights neighborhood on the east side. He previously spent eight years at Eastside Community Development, a neighborhood development organization.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
ADVERTISEMENT