IBJNews

Constantino's and City Market reach settlement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis City Market and anchor tenant Constantino's Market Place have agreed to an amicable divorce.

On Thursday, the two sides inked a settlement agreement in their dispute over $27,000 in unpaid rent. Constantino’s last day of operations in the market will be Dec. 24. The small business must remove its stand, equipment and belongings by Jan. 8.

“Both parties will part as friends,” said Constantino’s attorney Cliff Rubenstein, of Maurer Rifkin and Hill PC. “Constantino’s hopes the City Market is hugely successful in the future.”

Under the agreement, Indianapolis City Market Corp. will release Constantino’s from its obligation to pay its overdue rent. Riley Bennett and Egloff LLP partner Bryce Bennett, who represents the market, said there’s been “a lot of interest” from other potential tenants who could take over Constantino’s space. But no decision has been made on what will replace the stand, which sold fresh meats, cheese and produce.

“Litigation is an emotional as well as a financial drain,” Bennett said. “It’s just better at this point to agree to resolve it this way than to continue.”

Constantino’s ties to the City Market date back to 1911. Its owners, the Mascari family, closed their stand in 1996, but reopened it two years ago at the urging of market officials, who then expected a $2.7 million renovation of the main hall to bring back crowds. The Mascaris invested between $250,000 and $300,000 to build their 1,217-square-foot stand and install its refrigerated display cases.

In a Nov. 14 story, IBJ reported the 123-year-old City Market—which is now half-full, with only 25 tenants—had begun playing hardball with businesses in arrears, securing permission for Constantino’s eviction from Marion Superior Court Judge David Shaheed.

Constantino’s stopped paying rent 13 months ago, believing the terms of  its lease had been violated. After a hiatus, Constantino’s made partial payments in recent months. The business had argued it held exclusive rights to sell fresh fruit, vegetables and gift baskets in the City Market, and that the popular farmers’ market and several other stands violated its deal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.

ADVERTISEMENT