IBJNews

Indiana weighs changes to combat out-of-state casinos

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State lawmakers are weighing possible changes to state gambling laws at a time when growing competition from out-of-state casinos threatens to cut into business at Indiana's 11 riverboat casinos.

In Michigan, two tribal casinos have opened just north of the Indiana state line.

Ohio is building casinos in Toledo, Cincinnati, Columbus and Cleveland, and Kentucky is close to allowing slot machines at racetracks.

Meanwhile, Illinois is facing a $13 billion budget deficit and could finally authorize a Chicago casino.

Altogether, Indiana stands to lose more than $700 million a year in gambling revenue if it does nothing, the Legislative Services Agency recently reported.

And it's not just the casino industry at risk. State and local governments stand to lose some of the more than $1 billion a year in taxes and fees they take in from Hoosier casinos.

State Sen. Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said the threat from surrounding states is real.

"We've put together a pretty solid industry that actually employs over 16,000 people in the state of Indiana," Kenley said. "Are we going to do things that are going to keep it so that they can continue to operate and keep those people employed ... or are we going to turn our backs on them and create problems for them?"

Gambling, including the Hoosier Lottery, is the state of Indiana's third-largest source of revenue after income and sales taxes. Local governments reap more than $200 million a year from casinos.

The state Legislature's Gaming Study Committee released a list of 17 findings earlier this month — actions the General Assembly could approve to stay ahead of the other states.

Those include helping casinos save millions of dollars by eliminating the mandate that riverboats that never move must still have working engines and a sailing crew.

The committee also suggested restructuring the way slot machines at Indiana horse tracks are taxed, but perhaps the most significant was the finding that Indiana's riverboat casinos be allowed to move to land-based gaming.

When Indiana legalized riverboat gambling in 1993, the idea was that if it didn't work, boats would be easier to get rid of than buildings.

But now that casinos contribute so much to the state in terms of taxes and jobs, "the basis by which they were placed on water seems not to have much weight at this point in time," said Ernie Yelton, executive director of the Indiana Gaming Commission.

Gary Mayor Rudy Clay, whose city is home to two casinos, said it's time that Indiana move out of the "dark ages" and "Rip Van Winkle" era of confining casinos to riverboats.

"It's time to move forward here with land-based casinos and match these other states that are getting ready to put them up," Clay said.

While the Gaming Study Committee recommended many changes sought by the gaming industry, it said Indiana should keep its $3 per person casino admission tax and a wagering tax that ranges up to 40 percent of revenue — one of the nation's highest.

Since July, state revenue has come in $450 million below forecast, leading to state agency budget cuts and nearly 100 state worker layoffs.

"Every dollar we give away is a dollar we don't have for K-12 and higher ed," said state Rep. Jeff Espich, R-Uniondale.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. OK Larry, let's sign Lance, shore up the PG and let's get to the finals.

  2. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  3. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  4. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  5. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!

ADVERTISEMENT