Steep sales decline forces Hurco to slash executive pay

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The recession put a big hurt on sales at Hurco Cos. Inc. last year. It also took a toll on executive pay at the Indianapolis-based machine-tool maker.

Michael Doar, Hurco's chairman and CEO, took a 63.2-percent cut last fiscal year as a result of the deep recession. Hurco also substantially trimmed compensation of the rest of its management team.

“Our compensation program was significantly affected by the global recession, which led to a steep decline in worldwide demand for machine tools,” Hurco wrote in its annual proxy statement, which the company released Tuesday. “Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we reduced the base compensation of our executive officers and directors by 10 percent and suspended the company-match contribution to our 401(k) plan. In addition, there were no bonuses awarded in fiscal 2009.”

Hurco operates on a calendar that concludes Oct. 31. In its last fiscal year, the company’s revenue fell 59 percent, from nearly $224 million in fiscal 2008 to just $91 million in fiscal 2009. The steep declines in sales and service fees forced Hurco to slash expenses. Even so, the company’s annual profit dropped from $22.5 million to a net loss of $2.3 million.

During the fiscal year, Hurco’s stock price slipped from $23.76 per share to $15.90 per share. It had increased to $16.64 per share before the start of trading Wednesday morning.

Doar’s total fiscal 2009 compensation of $414,834 was $713,446 less than the $1.1 million he earned in the previous year. Most of the difference came down to Hurco’s decision to award him no bonus. In each of the previous two years, Doar had received bonuses of $670,000.

His two key lieutenants also saw their pay decline. Hurco Chief Financial Officer John G. Oblazney’s total compensation dropped 37.5 percent, from $316,037 in fiscal 2008 to $197,550 in fiscal 2009. Hurco Corporate Controller Sonja K. McClelland’s pay fell 46.2 percent, from $227,575 in fiscal 2008 to $122,420 in fiscal 2009.

Perhaps Hurco’s biggest ongoing management expense cut came from shrinking its leadership team. James D. Fabris resigned in early October after a 12-year stint on the management team. Hurco’s former president and chief operating officer earned fiscal 2009 compensation of $884,433, or 14.1-percent less than the $1 million he earned the previous year.

Much of Fabris’ pay came in the form of a $504,510 severance package that included a one-time payment of $52,260 and 18 months of his monthly base salary of $25,125.

Hurco will additionally pay Fabris a biweekly severance of $12,335 until he finds another job or until April 30, 2011, whichever comes first.

Board pay was another area in which Hurco managed to trim its expenses. The company awarded $227,050 in compensation to its seven independent directors, compared with $517,580 in compensation it awarded eight board members the previous year. Much of the difference was in options. In fiscal 2008, Hurco awarded board members Phillip James and Janaki Sivanesan options packages worth $153,540 each. Hurco gave no stock options to its directors in fiscal 2009.

IBJ uses the Associated Press formula to calculate executive pay. It gauges the value of compensation such as stock and options grants at the time they are awarded, not the time they are cashed in.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.