Key business issues clear mid-session hurdle

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two key issues for business groupsdelaying a hike in unemployment insurance taxes and reforming local governmentcleared major hurdles this week in the Indiana General Assembly.

The first half of a short session will close Wednesday, meaning bills must have passed out of either the House or Senate to stay alive. Legislation regarding unemployment taxes and township-government reform easily met that deadline.

The Senate passed a bill that would delay for one year a planned 70-percent increase in the amount of unemployment taxes paid by employers. The bulk of the burden, an estimated $400 million, was expected to fall to manufacturers and the construction industry.

“This is our main event for this sessionby far,” said Pat Kiely, president of the Indiana Manufacturers Association.

Kiely is now focused on the Democrat-controlled House, which does not have its own version of the unemployment taxes bill. “It’s really in their hands,” he said. “So far they’ve been working with us. Conversations are cordial.”

The Indiana Chamber of Commerce joined the effort to delay the unemployment tax hike, while also pushing to eliminate township governments and trying in vain to stop a National Rifle Association initiative.

Chamber President Kevin Brinegar was glad to see that township government reform will be a live issue when the General Assembly reconvenes next week. “It’s not exactly in the shape we want it in, but we’re pleased,” he said.

The House bill would have voters in each township decide by referendum whether to keep that form of government.

The Senate bill would eliminate townships’ boards of trustees and hand budgetary oversight to county councils. The Chamber is asking members to voice their support of the Senate version.

Despite disapproval from the Chamber of Commerce and the Manufacturers Association, both the House and Senate passed bills that prevent most employers from banning their employees from keeping firearms in their vehicles while parked on company property.

“The Second Amendment protects you from your government, not your employerthat’s what we tried to argue,” Kiely said.

Representatives from Eli Lilly and Co. and Cummins Inc. showed up at the Statehouse to testify against the bill, Kiely said.

Stakes were high this session for those who make a living on food, drink and gambling.

Indiana-based alcohol distributors hoped lawmakers would shore up their defense against Southern Wine & Spirits. The Miami-based wholesaler is trying to enter the market and has challenged an Indiana law that requires alcohol distributors to have their headquarters in the state. Senate Bill 244 reiterated that post-Prohibition era residency requirement, but it failed to get a vote on Tuesday.

Lawmakers will continue to grapple with the future of the state’s casinos when they return next week.

Gambling is a $2.7 billion industry and the state’s third-largest source of tax revenue, but it could soon face competition from Ohio and Kentucky. Currently, casino gambling is confined to boats on Lake Michigan, the Ohio River and an artificial moat in French Lick. Central Indiana has two racetracks with electronic games, but no cards or dice.

Late Tuesday evening, the Senate passed a bill that many members felt would make the existing industry more competitive but not expand its physical presence.  The bill contains no provision for land-based casinos, which would have paved the way for a new casino in northwest Indiana, and possibly one near Fort Wayne.

The bill that will move to the House tweaks the law in several areas. It allows riverboats to remove their navigation equipment and the “racinos” to handle Internet-based betting on horse races. All types of facilities could add card tournaments, serve free drinks and expand their marketing.

The bill also lowers the admission tax at French Lick from $4 to $3 per person and requires entities participating in local revenue sharing to demonstrate that they serve a public purpose.

Land-based casinos might get a second chance in the House, but Ed Feigenbaum, publisher of Indiana Gaming Insight, cautioned that the issue won’t be resolved easily.

The move to land would open new areas of the state to casino gambling, while pulling traffic away from others, he said. “There’s going to be a lot of alliances formed between companies and communities.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.