IBJNews

IPL sues engineering consultant over Eagle Valley discharge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Indianapolis Power and Light Co. is suing its engineering consultant over an industrial accident that spilled 30 million gallons of polluted water into White River.

IPL, a subsidiary of Arlington, Va.-based AES Corp., operates a 344-megawatt coal-fired power plant called the Eagle Valley Generating Station in Morgan County. Once burned, the coal turns to ash, which is then removed from the plant through a system of movable water pipes and discharged into five retaining ponds.

IDEM fined IPL after a pair of spills from its Eagle Valley plant. (IBJ File Photo)

According to its federal lawsuit, filed Jan. 29, as well as Indiana Department of Environmental Management records, Eagle Valley’s ponds are contained by a system of dikes. But on Feb. 14, 2007, one of the dikes breeched, releasing liquid ash effluent onto IPL’s property and ultimately into the adjacent White River.

IPL alleges it hired Lexington, Ky.-based Fuller Mossbarger Scott and May Engineers Inc. to examine the breech, supervise its repair, and improve Eagle Valley’s dike system to avoid future accidents. According to documents included in the suit, IPL paid its consultant $45,500 for the job.

But on Jan. 30, 2008, Eagle Valley’s dike system failed again, according to its lawsuit. IDEM investigated both incidents, and found the second levee breech occurred in the same location as the first.

IDEM assessed IPL a $23,800 civil penalty. It also required IPALCO to study the site, submit its findings to IDEM, implement repairs, and follow up with regular inspections. If IPL fails to comply with IDEM’s time line, it’s subject to $500-per-week penalties.

IPL’s federal lawsuit against Fuller Mossbarger Scott and May Engineers—which was acquired in 2008 by Alberta, Canada-based Santec Inc.—attempts to assign responsibility and liability for the second spill to the engineering consultant. IPL seeks compensatory damages, as well as the costs and fines it incurred responding to the second effluent spill.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
ADVERTISEMENT