IBJNews

Brizzi contributor Epperly no stranger to controversy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Greg Andrews

Harrison Epperly, the Indianapolis businessman entangled in a controversy over campaign contributions to Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi, is a wildly successful self-made man with a penchant for finding trouble.

Epperly, 78, came to Indianapolis a half-century ago to own and run a service station. He later launched a brake shop and expanded it into a 23-store chain before selling the business in 1986 for $11.1 million.

Then, in the depths of the early ’90s real estate slump, Epperly poured cash into golf courses in Florida and industrial properties and downtown office buildings here—bets that appeared to pay off when the economy improved and he cashed out.

But Epperly also left a trail of litigation and business associates who felt shortchanged. And in 2000, a federal judge sentenced him to a year of home detention after he pleaded guilty to improperly removing asbestos from 41 E. Washington St., a building he later sold that now houses IBJ Media. Prosecutors said workers removed the dangerous material with a sledgehammer and saw, violating the Clean Air Act.

Donations preceded release

The latest flap involves $29,000 he gave Brizzi from 2006 to 2008. During the same span, an attorney for his daughter, who’d been convicted in a murder-for-hire scheme, was negotiating a sentence modification with Brizzi’s office—an effort that succeeded last year.

The story, reported first by IBJ’s news-gathering partner, WXIN-TV Channel 59, is a new headache for Brizzi, who’s already taking a political drubbing over his friendship with Indianapolis businessman Tim Durham, the subject of federal securities fraud investigations. The Republican last month decided against seeking a third term.

Epperly’s daughter, Paula Epperly Willoughby, was sentenced to 110 years in prison in 1991 after her husband was gunned down outside the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. An appeal shrank the sentence to 70 years. The modification cut it to time served, and Willoughby was freed in July.

WXIN reported that Epperly also donated $2,500 to Brizzi’s chief trial deputy, David Wyser, who’s running for Hamilton County prosecutor. That contribution came in May, a month before the filing of the sentence modification in court.

Both Brizzi and Wyser recently returned their donations, many of which came through Epperly’s company EMSP LLC. Wyser told WXIN the donations had no role in the modification, which he argued was justified based on Willoughby’s rehabilitation and family issues. One of Willoughby’s sons had been killed by a drunken driver in 2005, leaving another son with no immediate family members other than his imprisoned mother.

The making of a millionaire

For Epperly, who could not be reached for comment, the campaign donations represent a drop in the bucket. A decade ago, when he was facing the asbestos-removal charge, his net worth was estimated at more than $20 million.

Much of that stems from his success with United Brake Systems Corp. In 1976, Epperly opened his first location outside Indianapolis. A decade later, he sold the entire chain to Connecticut-based Echlin Inc., at the time a Fortune 500 company.

The deal, while a bonanza for Epperly, also spawned ill will. Kenneth Jarrett, who managed the company’s second location, in Nashville, Tenn., sued, charging Epperly reneged on an oral agreement to make him 49-percent owner of that operation if he managed it for 10 years.

Court records say the promise played a key role in luring Jarrett away from his previous employer. After the sale, Epperly initially promised to pay him the part of the purchase price representing the stake but never did, according to a U.S. Court of Appeals decision upholding an $812,000 judgment against Epperly.

“In fact,” the ruling says, “when another employee asked Epperly about his promise to Jarrett, Epperly replied, ‘Forty-nine percent of what? Of nothing?’”

Another business associate, Fred Johnson, sued Epperly in 1995 after getting cut out of a deal to buy a Florida golf course.

Court papers say Johnson learned the course was for sale and contacted Epperly because he didn’t have his own money to invest. The suit said Epperly orally agreed to loan Johnson $150,000 as Johnson’s 25-percent share of the down payment. But he never made the loan, and instead Epperly and his partners bought the course without him.

A jury awarded Johnson $1 million in actual damages and $2 million in punitive damages. The Indiana Court of Appeals in 2000 threw out the punitive damages, but let the other award stand.

Epperly contends that he didn’t have to live up to the agreement because Johnson’s attorney never presented him with a loan agreement—an argument the appeals court did not find persuasive.

Johnson testified that after the purchase closed, he approached Epperly and asked him to provide the promised ownership interest.

“Epperly laughed, got into his car and drove off,” according to Johnson.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Not So
    If Brizzi is coated with teflon he needs a new coat. He's gotten pounded in the media and his reputation is in tatters. As far as no consequences, the feds have just now started to look into things. They haven't even hauled Durham away in handcuffs. That will happen first, then it's very possible Brizzi will be next.
  • Nice but what next
    The IBJ does a great job of reporting. But to what end? Nothing ever seems to happen to Brizzi. He is coated in Teflon.He just keeps on getting bad press and getting into trouble, but nothing ever seems to happen to him.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT