IBJNews

Brookfield after 30-percent stake in General Growth, source says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Brookfield Asset Management Inc. is in talks with General Growth Properties Inc. to take a 30-percent stake in the shopping mall owner as it comes out of bankruptcy, said a person familiar with the negotiations.

The plan by Toronto-based Brookfield would give General Growth a higher valuation than a $10 billion takeover bid by Simon Property Group Inc., said the person, who declined to be identified because the talks aren’t public.

Indianapolis-based Simon, the largest U.S. shopping mall owner, has offered to purchase General Growth in a deal that would give equity investors about $9 a share and repay unsecured creditors in full. Chicago-based General Growth said the bid, made public on Feb. 16, was too low and invited other potential buyers to make offers.

Brookfield owns almost $1 billion in General Growth debt, two people with knowledge of the company’s holdings said last week. General Growth may raise up to $2 billion or more from public markets to fund its exit from bankruptcy, according to one of those people, who asked not to be named because the talks are private.

Denis Couture, a spokesman for Brookfield, declined to comment. David Keating, a spokesman for General Growth, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

General Growth’s shares have rallied past Simon’s buyout offer, signaling investors expect a higher bid. The stock rose 39 cents, or 3.1 percent, to $13.15 each Tuesday afternoon in over-the-counter trading.

William Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management LP, General Growth’s largest shareholder, in December issued a 54-page presentation that said the stock is worth $24 to $43. Pershing Square, based in New York, owns a 25-percent economic interest in General Growth, including 7.5 percent of its shares.

Based on the current valuations for U.S. mall owners and Simon and Brookfield’s “strong strategic and financial motivations,” General Growth is probably worth $11 to $18 a share, Green Street Advisors Inc., a Newport Beach, California- based research company, said in a Jan. 13 note.

Brookfield’s plan to bid for a stake in General Growth was reported yesterday by the Wall Street Journal.

General Growth, the owner of New York’s South Street Seaport and Boston’s Faneuil Hall, filed the biggest real-estate bankruptcy in U.S. history in April after amassing $27 billion in debt during an acquisition spree.

Brookfield said in a Feb. 19 letter to shareholders that it “acquired a substantial amount of defaulted bank debt issued by General Growth Properties” at a discount to par value. In a fourth-quarter earnings conference call that day, Brookfield Chief Executive Officer Bruce Flatt and other executives declined to discuss General Growth.

Flatt said in his Feb. 19 letter that Brookfield believes that “acquiring assets through distress situations offers one of the few ways to acquire assets at meaningful discounts to their intrinsic value.” Brookfield last year assembled a $5 billion equity group to invest in distressed properties.

Brookfield owns more than 100 office buildings; 2.9 million acres of timber and agricultural land in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil; apartment complexes; 20 shipping terminals in Europe and Australia; 164 hydroelectric plants; railroads in Australia; natural-gas pipelines in the U.S.; and a property-brokerage business with almost 40,000 brokers in about 2,000 offices in Canada, the U.S. and the U.K.

Blackstone Group LP, the world’s largest private-equity firm, may join Simon’s bid, two people with knowledge of the discussions said on Feb. 18. Blackstone is in preliminary talks with Simon, said the people, who declined to be identified because the negotiations are private. Indianapolis-based Simon would lead any resulting partnership, one of the people said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT