IBJNews

State health commissioner leaving for CDC

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Dr. Judy Monroe, Indiana’s state health commissioner, will step down March 8 to become deputy director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Monroe, a former Indianapolis family physician in the St. Vincent Health network, led the state’s public health efforts for five years after being appointed by Gov. Mitch Daniels in March 2005.

Until Daniels appoints a new commissioner, Loren Robertson, deputy health commissioner, will fill Monroe’s job on an interim basis.

Under Monroe’s oversight, the state created a hospital-errors reporting system, which has helped reduce the prevalence of severe bed sores, and the INShape Indiana initiative, which aimed to lower smoking and obesity rates and improve physical activity rates.

The results of the INShape Indiana effort have been mixed. From 2004 to 2009, the percentage of Hoosier adults who were obese rose from 26 percent to 26.9 percent. But, according to data compiled by the UnitedHealth Foundation, Indiana’s ranking among states did improve during that time frame.

The percentage of adults who smoke held steady at 26 percent, although Indiana’s ranking slipped compared with other states.

The percentage of adults exercising each month fell from nearly 75 percent in 2004 to 72 percent in 2008, according to data from the Indiana State Department of Health.

Lastly, the percentage of children with the complete set of immunizations dipped slightly, from 79 percent in 2004 to 78.4 percent last year. But Indiana’s ranking improved compared with other states, according to the UnitedHealth Foundation.

“I’ll leave Indiana with a great sense of pride and gratitude,” Monroe said in a statement. “Fortunately, I will continue to be involved with the health departments in my new position.”

Her new job will take Monroe to the CDC headquarters in Atlanta. From there she will manage three divisions of the CDC and oversee the deployment of CDC resources in state, local, territorial, and tribal public health agencies.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT