IBJNews

Marine tech unit to fill four floors at struggling M&I Plaza

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A civilian division of the U.S. Marine Corps has agreed to move its operation from Missouri and take almost 75,000 square feet in downtown’s M&I Plaza.

The 10-year, $20 million deal for four full floors of the 28-story building will push the city’s sixth-largest office tower from a woeful 30-percent occupancy rate to about 50 percent.

The Marine Corps Technology Services Organization plans to move from Kansas City, Mo., in two phases starting this summer and finishing up in January 2011. The operation, which has a staff of 247, chose from five possible sites as part of a U.S. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission decision.

M&I deal factboxThe move gives the building’s owner, White Plains, N.Y.-based True North Management Group, some momentum as it pursues several smaller deals for the 21-year-old property.

“This is a great deal for the building—and great for downtown,” said Jon Owens, a principal in the local office of Cassidy Turley who represented the building owner in the transaction.

The deal is particularly notable because it involves a new-to-market tenant bringing jobs to downtown and helps stabilize one of the city’s most troubled buildings, said Thomas E. Hadley, executive vice president for office leasing at locally based Summit Realty Group.

More deals like it would give a much-needed boost to the ailing downtown office market. Summit reported a fourth-quarter 2009 vacancy rate of 19.7 percent for the central business district, up 6.2 percentage points over a year earlier. Overall office vacancy for the Indianapolis area stood at 22 percent.

Even with the Marine Corps deal, the 673,000-square-foot M&I Plaza has more than 300,000 vacant square feet, including the top six floors of the reflective glass and red-granite building. The biggest blow came in late 2008 when the building’s largest tenant, law firm Bose McKinney & Evans, moved across the street to Chase Tower.

Efforts to refill the space had been slowed until recently by two ownership changes in rapid succession. Mezzanine lender CapitalSource Inc. of Maryland took control of the building from New York-based Crown Green Associates LLC in late 2008. True North took over from CapitalSource in late 2009. Both actions followed defaults on loans.

“[The deal] sends a message to the market that they’re doing deals, are stable and are looking to rent more space,” Hadley said. “That’s healthy for the space to be absorbed, and brings more people downtown.”

BRAC voted in 2005 to close the Kansas City operation. The move will present local hiring opportunities, as some employees will be retiring and others will not make the move, said Philip Westcott, a BRAC liaison for the Marine Corps.

“We’re encouraging as many as possible to move to Indianapolis,” he said. “For those who don’t move, obviously the positions and function have to move.”

The division, which will occupy the 19th through 22nd floors, handles information technology, payroll, personnel and accounting services for the Marine Corps.

M&I Plaza factsPart of the rationale for choosing Indianapolis is that the city already serves as headquarters for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service at the 1-million-square-foot Maj. Gen. Emmett J. Bean Federal Center along East 56th Street at the former Fort Benjamin Harrison. That facility employs about 4,000 people.

The deal is for 74,762 rentable square feet and 188 parking spaces for annual rent payments of $2.2 million, said David Wilkinson, a spokesman for the General Services Administration.

The cost of roughly $29 per square foot includes the amortized cost of building out the space and reserving off-site parking, Owens said. The base rent is near the building average of about $18 per square foot.

Previous owner Crown Green Associates had tried for more than a year to sell the tower for $60 million before it lost control of the property.

The building at 135 N. Pennsylvania St. was valued most recently for tax purposes at $26.7 million, down from a prior assessment of $77.9 million. The building sold for more than $50 million in 1997 and traded again for $38 million in 2002, when it was 70-percent occupied.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT