IBJNews

Hilbert in-law's insurance fraud trial set for October

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A civil lawsuit over an alleged $15 million insurance fraud scheme involving the deceased mother-in-law of Indianapolis businessman Stephen Hilbert is set for a jury trial in October.

The Wall Street Journal  published a story about the legal battle on its front page on Monday morning. IBJ first reported details of the dispute in January 2009 and followed up in July.

Houston-based American General Life Insurance Company is attempting to invalidate a $15 million policy it issued in January 2006 insuring the life of Germaine “Suzy” Tomlinson—Hilbert’s mother-in-law—who died Sept. 28, 2008, at age 74. AIG alleges the policy was part of a stranger-originated life insurance scheme.

In such cases, outside investors essentially wager on when an insured person will die. In a typical transaction, an investor entices someone—usually a senior citizen—to take out a multimillion-dollar life insurance policy. Investors then purchase the policy and pay the premiums, making themselves the beneficiaries. In return, the insured person receives an upfront cut of the eventual death payout.

Under the arrangement, the sooner the insured person dies, the better the return for investors.

The initial defendants in the Tomlinson case were J.B. Carlson, owner of the locally-based Carlson Media Group; Nevada insurance broker Geofrey A. Vanderpal; and Delaware-based Willmington Trust Co.

Carlson has argued that Tomlinson served as vice chairman and a director of his company, which paid annual premiums of $387,275 on the policy. As trustee, Carlson has argued he’s entitled to the $15 million payout. In court documents, Carlson said Tomlinson began attending Carlson Media Group board meetings in November 2002, making the $15 million policy “key man” insurance.

Hilbert’s wife, Tomisue, last summer intervened in the insurance tussle, arguing that AIG should not invalidate the $15 million policy. Instead, she said the proceeds should go to Tomlinson’s five adult children.

IBJ alerted Hilbert and the Indiana Department of Insurance to AIG’s lawsuit in January 2009. Hilbert initially feared foul play, but the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department ruled Tomlinson's death an accidental bathtub drowning. Investigators believe Tomlinson slipped in the tub and hit her head on the spigot.

But the WSJ story adds some intriguing new details about Tomlinson’s last hours, noting, for example, that police found her dead in the bathtub “fully clothed from an evening out at a martini bar, high heels still on her feet.”

According to the WSJ, Carlson was the last person to see Tomlinson alive. The newspaper said Carlson took her home “tipsy” after accompanying her to the fifth anniversary party of the Blu Martini.

“I placed her in a love seat and walked toward the door, I clapped my hands to get her attention and told her to lock the door … The last time I saw Suzy Tomlinson, she was alive,” Carlson reportedly told the WSJ.

But Hilbert isn’t convinced by that explanation, according to the newspaper. His mother-in-law didn't take baths, he told reporters. Hilbert did not return a call Monday from IBJ.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wait a minute!
    What insurance company in it's right mind would issue a $15 million policy on a woman 71 years old? Doesn't make sense to me. Insurance companies make money on long lives and paid up term policies.
  • AIG Fraud
    I researched the AIG case with the $15 Million policy and if Ms. Tomlinson was a Board member and shareholder as claimed, there is no insurable interest issue. AIG's assertion that this is a Stranger Owned Life (STOLI) policy is incorrect. In fact this seems to be a pattern of AIG not paying claims, most likely due to their financial condition and unethical activities which are documented all over the internet. Various states and the SEC have fined and investigated AIG for various violations. AIG is not to be trusted and I would never buy one of their policies.
  • Form what I know about that whole family----
    It is a complete fraud and possibly murder.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT