Rockefeller: Insurers don't spend enough on medical care

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Insurance companies including WellPoint Inc. and Aetna Inc. don’t provide consumers the benefits they paid for, which is why the industry needs close supervision, U.S. Senator Jay Rockefeller said Thursday.

Many insurers spent less revenue from premiums on medical care than is called for under the health overhaul passed last month, according to a report released by Rockefeller’s office. The legislation requires insurance companies to spend at least 85 percent of the premium revenue for large group insurance on medical care, and 80 percent of the revenue for individual and small group insurance.

While individual insurers now decide what categories to include in the ratio, the health law demands that all companies classify medical costs the same way beginning in 2011. What will be included under the ratio is being developed by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, with the input of state insurance commissioners.

Only Cigna Corp. among the six largest U.S. insurers met the 80 percent threshold for the individual market in 2009, according to the report. Aetna spent 76 percent of premiums on medical care, while Humana Inc. spent 68 percent. The data in the report is from the Kansas City, Mo.-based National Association of Insurance Commissioners, which regulates insurance companies at the state level.

Indianapolis-based WellPoint “reclassified” more than half a billion dollars of administrative expenses as medical expenses when it was defining its medical-loss ratio, Rockefeller’s report said. In March, the company announced it would consider nurse call-in centers and wellness programs to be medical costs.

“Consumers can rest assured that our watchful eye will require health insurance companies to comply with the law by actually spending more money on patient care—not doing all they can to cut corners and cook the books,” Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat who is chairman of the Senate’s commerce committee, said in a statement.

WellPoint spokeswoman Kristin Binns said the company plans to expand disease-management programs, wellness initiatives and other items that are not counted as part of medical expenses by other insurers.

“We share the senator’s commitment to ensuring that the maximum resources possible are devoted to health coverage, disease management, wellness and other programs designed to improve our members’ health and medical,” Binns said in an e- mail.

Rockefeller’s report comes after America’s Health Insurance Plans, a Washington-based lobbyist for 1,300 insurers, and the Chicago-based Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, with 39 members, said they are negotiating with the state insurance commissioners group over how to define what medical costs should be included.

Insurance industry lobbyists said they were pushing for the inclusion of technology expenses, wellness programs and pay-for-performance under the threshold. Many companies now include only medical claims under the heading.

Cigna Chief Executive Officer David Cordani said in an interview that he was confident the Obama administration will allow insurers to count spending on nurses who advise customers as a medical expense. Sebelius and congressional staff indicated a willingness to do so in conversations over the past six weeks, he said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. OK Larry, let's sign Lance, shore up the PG and let's get to the finals.

  2. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  3. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  4. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  5. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!