IBJNews

Braly, Obama spar again over WellPoint cancellation policies

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Angela Braly keeps sparring with President Obama’s administration—this time with the president himself.

The CEO of Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. dashed off a letter on Sunday trying to rebut Obama’s weekend criticism of the health insurer for reports that it seeks out breast cancer patients to cancel their policies.

Such claims were reported last month by the news service Reuters, but WellPoint called the story “inaccurate and grossly misleading.”

In her letter, Braly reported that WellPoint paid for breast cancer coverage for 200,000 women last year and canceled the policies of just four. None of the cancellations were because the women had breast cancer, Braly said, suggesting instead that the women had misrepresented their health status.

The Obama administration first chided WellPoint immediately after the Reuters story appeared on April 22. Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, wrote a letter to Braly, calling WellPoint’s alleged practice “deplorable” and “unconscionable” and asking for WellPoint to stop the practice immediately.

Then on Saturday, during his weekly radio address, Obama noted how Sebelius’ letter got results—even though he didn’t name WellPoint specifically.

“When we found that an insurance company was systematically dropping the coverage of women diagnosed with breast cancer, my administration called on them to put an end to this practice immediately,” Obama said. “Two weeks ago, the entire insurance industry announced that it would comply with the new law early, and stop the perverse practice of dropping people’s coverage when they get sick.”

WellPoint did change its rescission policy two weeks ago to match the new health law signed by Obama in March. The new law says health insurers can cancel a customer’s policy only in cases of fraud or intentional lying. Previously, health insurers would sometimes cancel a customer’s policy even if he or she omitted or misconstrued information, even unwittingly.

Braly chided Obama for continuing to attack health insurers—as he did effectively in working to get the law passed—at a time when implementing the new law requires greater collaboration.

“If we are going to make this law work on behalf of all Americans,” Braly wrote, “the attacks on the health insurance industry—a valued industry that provides coverage for more than 200 million Americans—must end.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wellpoint Cancellations
    Let's repost the quote:

    ââ?¬Å?If we are going to make this law work on behalf of all Americans,ââ?¬Â? Braly wrote, ââ?¬Å?the attacks on the health insurance industryââ?¬â??a valued industry that provides coverage for more than 200 million Americansââ?¬â??must end.ââ?¬Â?

    CEOS of companies like Wellpoint, making the salaries that they do with the perks that they get and then firing people and then giving them MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in severence to go away is WHAT MUST END.

    HOW ABOUT THIS IDEA, LET'S DO AWAY WITH INSURANCE COMPANIES ALL TOGETHER AND SEE HOW QUICKLY THE HOSPITALS AND PROVIDERS GET USED TO MAKING LESS MONEY. Let's see how quickly healthcare costs come down. Isn't it a fact that our providers charge more so that they can get what insurance companies deem as reasonable and customary. What about our 20% we have to pay and what about all those poor souls who are private pays. I shutter at the thought.

    The increase rate excuses that is being put out to upgrade systems to meet the rules and regulations of the new Obama healthcare plan is yet another excuse so that these CEO's can continue to have their ridiculous needs met.

    OH AND BY THE WAY LET'S TALK ABOUT WHY WE PAY A PERSON MILLIONS TO THROUGH A FOOTBALL OR TO GET UP ON A STAGE AND SING A SONG OR ACTORS WHO GET PAID MILLIONS PER EPISODE WHILE PEOPLE ARE DYING ANOTHER DAY.

    I'm sorry but this all seems so wrong to me.
  • Anthem Increases
    Anthem/Wellpoint hit our manufacturing company with a 34.5% increasse in monthly premiums this year. That is an increase from $36K per month to $48.5K per month. These guys are ruthlessly damaging our country's manufactuing base with thier rate increases. Someone needs to put a stop to this. Washington is not usually the answer but companies like Wellpoint cannot self regulate. Braly's 2009 Comp - $13.1M She makes all the jokes about lawyers seem very true!!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT