IBJOpinion

DINING: Keeping customers happy an elemental test of eateries

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

I’ve never been to the original Pennsylvania Street eatery, so I had no point of reference for my inaugural trip to Urban Element II (415 N. Alabama St., 602-5408). All the better to avoid potential disappointment—with one restaurant or the other—since comparisons between the two would be unavoidable.

But I had been in the Alabama space before, during its previous life as Elements, the similarly named but unrelated fine-dining restaurant that closed last year. Not much has changed in terms of decor, but menu is decidedly more accessible, both in price and concept. Think chicken tenders, not beef cheeks.
 

Urban Elements 2 The Curried Chicken Salad was the highlight of our lengthy—but free—lunch. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Lucky enough to find a parking meter out front, my dining companion and I arrived for lunch and settled in for our meal, ordering the decadent Shrimp and Crab Bake ($8) to tide us over while we waited for our healthy(ish) sandwiches. And we waited.

After about 30 minutes and a trip outside to plug the meter, our server arrived tableside with not our food but a confession: He had forgotten to ring up our appetizer. No apology, no promise of expediency, just the facts, ma’am.

His attitude raised our eyebrows, but mistakes happen. We were enjoying our conversation, and neither of us had to rush back to the office. (Of course, I was on the clock, anyway, although he didn’t know that since our reviews are anonymous.)

And when another staffer delivered the warm bowl of creamy, crabby goodness a short time later with the promise of a 50-percent discount, all the better. How such problems are fixed says a lot about a restaurant’s culture.

It didn’t take long for our meals to arrive, but in the meantime we exchanged sympathetic looks with a couple of other tables of diners who also had been waiting awhile. Then we forgot all about them and dug in.

My Curried Chicken Salad Sandwich and side salad ($6.50) was outstanding—plenty of chunks of grilled chicken tossed in a spicy green curry sauce, topped with mixed greens and served between two pieces of pita bread. The salad also was good, aided by a tasty—and unusual—pineapple vinaigrette.

The Veggie Sandwich ($6) my friend ordered also delivered, but in less- spectacular fashion. Wheat bread sandwiched sliced cucumbers, tomatoes, red onions and avocado and two kinds of cheese—though the promised cheddar looked more like American. The standard side of fries was OK, but nothing to rave about.

So did we get the promised half-price appetizer to compensate us for our lengthy lunch? Not exactly. While we were debating who would take home the yummy leftover crab bake, one of the other diners got our attention to tell us he had picked up our tab, along with that of the table next to us. Turns out he was one of the owners, and he wanted to apologize for our wait.

Since he had no way of knowing we were reviewing the restaurant, we accepted, thanked him, and planned our next trip—on our own dime.•

—Andrea Muirragui Davis

__________

First in our month-long series of “elemental” restaurant reviews.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wonderful Lunch
    I work near both locations and visit frequently for lunch with co-workers. At Urban Element it's all about the food and a relaxed environment. If you know what to expect then you won't be disappointed. The service is relaxed and easy, and if you ask, they'll make you're food the way you want it if you have any special requests. I'll be coming back again and again.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT