Durham willingly turning over assets in Fair bankruptcy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Greg Andrews

Investors in Fair Finance Co. haven’t received much in the way of good news since the Tim Durham-owned company halted interest payments and stopped cashing in investment certificates in November.

But here’s some that’s more than a little surprising: Durham, the Indianapolis businessman who purchased the Akron, Ohio, finance company eight years ago, is cooperating with attorneys in Fair’s 4-month-old bankruptcy case. He’s facing up to the reality he owes the company a bundle and is shoveling over assets.

“He acknowledges he has an outstanding loan and is turning over property and proceeds [from asset sales] toward reducing those obligations,” said Kelly Burgan, a Cleveland attorney representing the trustee overseeing the company’s liquidation.

Those include prized Peter Max paintings that adorned his Geist Reservoir mansion. He already has turned over some artwork to the bankruptcy trustee and plans to turn over more, setting the stage for a court-supervised auction.

Durham, who has spent most of his time in California since FBI agents raided company offices two days before Thanksgiving, recently put the 10,000-square-foot Geist home on the block for $5.5 million. And he’s been selling off his exotic car collection, which exceeded 30 vehicles at its peak.

Yet the company’s 5,000 investors—all Ohio residents, many elderly and living on modest incomes—are unlikely to receive a big slice of the $200 million they’re owed, at least anytime soon.

Here’s the harsh reality: Some of Durham’s most valuable assets have first liens against them, denting the amount that might ultimately flow to Fair. The home, for instance, serves as collateral on a $1.9 million line of credit from Shelby County Bank. Assuming the house fetched the asking price—a fanciful thought in this slumping market—Fair gets a few million.

And the professionals in bankruptcy court who’ve launched an assault on Durham’s assets aren’t doing charity work. Their fees are sure to run into the millions of dollars. Burgan, a partner with Cleveland’s Baker & Hostetler, bills at $400 an hour. Jay Jaffe, a Baker & Daniels partner in Indianapolis who’s helping with the case, has an hourly rate of $500. A forensic accountant and forensic computer expert each charge $250 an hour.

Records filed with securities regulators show Durham used Fair like a personal bank after buying it in 2002, with money flowing to support an ostentatious lifestyle, friends and business associates, as well as other companies he owned. The records show he withdrew tens of millions under a line of credit and that he and associates borrowed even larger sums through businesses they controlled.

Related-party loans now top $168 million and represent the primary asset available to repay investors, who purchased investment certificates with interest rates as high as 9.5 percent. But it’s far from clear how much is actually collectible, and some of the loans are poorly documented, exacerbating the challenge.

Given the realities, trustee Brian Bash, another partner at Baker & Hostetler in Cleveland, must strike a balance between being aggressive and picking his battles carefully.

“You don’t want to launch an expensive lawsuit pursuing an entity that doesn’t have any assets,” Burgan said.

Still, asset collection would be far tougher were Durham not cooperating. In one of the most significant developments, his attorneys consented to turn over all the assets of two related firms that borrowed from Fair and then loaned to insiders—a move that eases the way for the trustee to chase down some of the biggest borrowers.

“I think there will be recoveries made, and there are already things starting to fall into place,” said David Mucklow, a Green, Ohio, attorney hired as special litigation counsel in the bankruptcy.

But no one dares estimate what the recovery might be, or how long it might take. The best Mucklow would do was call the expected recovery “substantial.”

Silent on strategy

Why the 47-year-old Durham chose to cooperate is sheer speculation, since his attorney, Gary Sallee of Indianapolis, is not returning calls. Perhaps Durham feels for investors. Or he could be positioning himself for favorable treatment by the Justice Department—which for months has been investigating whether he operated Fair as a Ponzi scheme, selling new investment certificates to pay off prior purchasers.

But this much is clear: His acknowledgment of debts doesn’t mean he’s acknowledging wrongdoing. In a filing early this year, his attorneys said offering circulars provided to prospective investors included an abundance of information disclosing the potential risks. That their bets ultimately soured goes with the territory, the filing suggested.

Buyers “assumed the risk of purchasing unsecured investments,” it said.•


  • Sound Familiar?
    Where have we heard this story before?

  • Greg will sleep just fine
    Greg Andrews is just writing a news story.He was the only one to stay on the case.What would comments do to alter the resolution of this whole situation? Tim got to party and live large now the tab is due.
  • this case
    he'll never be charged with a crime. he's an intelligent thief, what he's keeping is so far hidden it won't be found. nowdays with everything being searched and recorded by p/c, makes stealing and hiding easier.
  • Brizzi
    Carl Brizzi, is that you? Are you enjoying your last moments as a free man? Or are you more worried that your lifestyle is in transition.
  • Who is REALLY to blame?
    Hmmm, when this non-story was first published, and every tiny detail posted as though it was really newsworthy, the green eyed monster of wealth envy reared its ugly head and a chain reaction was set into motion. Comments and wild speculations ran rampant, accusations and "predictions" were posted that had nothing to do with the facts at all. The real victims truly ARE the investors, but whose fault is that? Fair Finance is history. The company was forced to file bankruptcy because an INVESTMENT company needs something to invest... hmmm perhaps Mr. Greg Andrews is the one who should be losing sleep.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.