IBJNews

Home medical supply firm grows as industry boom approaches

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Profile - Small Biz

In 2004, Home Health Depot Inc.’s revenue was stagnant, but David Hartley thought the home medical equipment supplier was a diamond in the rough.

So Harley, then working as a representative for medical equipment manufacturers, pulled $85,000 from his savings and bought the 5-year-old firm. Nearly six years later, Hartley has reinvented the Indianapolis-based company, growing from a single office in Greenwood to 12 locations in Indiana and Illinois—and increasing annual revenue from $300,000 to more than $6.7 million.

And Home Health Depot’s potential client base is getting larger as baby boomers get older, setting the firm up for continued success.

“It’s a tsunami of business coming our way,” said Hartley, 40.

Home Health Depot Jeff Herbig, a Home Health Depot rehabilitation specialist, adjusts a wheelchair for a client. The company is growing as Baby Boomers age. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Indeed, the 65-and-older age group is the fastest-growing demographic in the United States, accounting for more than 12 percent of the population in 2000. By 2050, that should climb to more than 20 percent, according to Congressional Research Service projections.

Adding to the wave of demand for Home Health Depot’s services: More elderly Americans are eschewing long-term-care facilities and choosing to remain at home.

“Health care spending has been growing tremendously over the last couple decades,” said Anthony Cox, an Indiana University Kelley School of Business-Indianapolis professor of marketing who specializes in medical products and services. “And one of the fastest-growing industries is in-home medical care.”

Home Health Depot nearly doubled annual revenue last year, from $3.8 million in 2008, as it added seven new locations. Since 2007, sales have increased 157 percent, earning it a spot on IBJ’s June list of the region’s fastest-growing companies.

In October, the company signed a contract with Veterans Affairs hospitals in Indianapolis, Fort Wayne, Marion and Danville, Ill., becoming their sole home medical equipment provider.

The firm also has attracted outside funders, including local businessmen Michael S. Maurer and Bob Schloss, who invested an undisclosed amount in Home Health Depot in February. The pair co-owns IBJ Media, parent of the Indianapolis Business Journal.

Hartley expects to finalize an agreement with another investment partner this summer, although he declined to provide details.

Although about two-thirds of its customers are elderly, Hartley said that’s not the only reason for the firm’s growth. He also credits its diverse product line.

Typically, suppliers specialize in a specific kind of home medical equipment—respiratory devices, for example, or mobility tools like wheelchairs and scooters. Home Health Depot works with 150 manufacturers to offer it all, setting the firm apart from its mostly national competitors.

Another difference that bodes well for the company: Only about a third of Home Health Depot’s revenue comes from government programs like Medicare, Hartley said. The rest comes from customers paying cash.

home healthGiven the turbulence of the health care industry in the wake of federal reform, it is hard for companies dependent on government funding to project profits past the next few years, said Paula Koenig, president of the Association of Indiana Home Medical Equipment Services.

“There’s increased pressure from all sides, and huge government insolence,” Koenig said, citing tighter Medicaid funding and more required documentation and auditing. “[The government] is asking us to do a lot more for less.”

Even so, efforts are being made to improve long-term-care options, said Orion Bell, CEO of CICOA In-Home Solutions, a local not-for-profit overseeing a state program that provides in-home support services to the elderly and disabled.

“Government cuts … are more about budget constraints of the state, and should have a short-term effect,” he said. “It shows fiscal constraint, not a policy change.”

For example, a state waiver program that allows participants to use Medicaid payments for in-home care will be offered to 12,000 people in 2010—36 percent more than in 2008.

And staying at home means saving money. Hartley said home care costs 30 percent to 50 percent less than institutional care.

A private room in a nursing home costs more than $75,600 a year in Indiana, according to Genworth Financial’s 2010 Cost of Care Survey, and long-term-care expenses are expected to increase 6 percent a year.

“The preventative savings are there,” Bell said. “It’s becoming a rebalancing of long-term care.”

Moreover, where former generations held an attitude of “doctor knows best,” explained IU’s Cox, baby boomers lean toward medical autonomy. Consumers want to call their own shots, a mind-set to which marketers must be sensitive, he said.

Enter Hartley, who aims to give clients everything they need to stay at home. That’s quite a different perspective than he had in his first career—in the RV industry. Hartley, who grew up in Elkhart and attended IU, started working for Katz at Home Health Depot after deciding the recreational vehicle business was too cyclical.

Now that Home Health Depot has expanded its geographic reach, its owner and CEO wants to build business around each location. By next year, Hartley hopes to provide coverage to 85 percent of Indiana residents. He’s also eyeing locations in Detroit as well as major cities in Ohio.

Eventually, Home Health Depot should bring in $40 million to $50 million a year, Hartley said, giving the company “economies of scale to buy more and be more efficient … but not too big to keep an ear close to patients.”

“There are two schools to expansion,” Hartley said. “One is wide, the other is deep. At first, we’re going to set our flags in the ground, wide, and then we’re really going to focus on going deep in each market.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Nice
    Good article, its nice to see family owned medical supply stores getting some recognition.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT