IBJNews

CIB approves $33.5 million deal to keep Indiana Pacers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Pacers likely will stay put in their current home of Conseco Fieldhouse for at least the next three years, thanks to a deal approved Friday afternoon by the Capital Improvement Board that provides the franchise at least $33.5 million.

Under the terms of the agreement, the CIB will give Pacers Sports & Entertainment $10 million per year for three years, specifically to defray the costs of operating Conseco Fieldhouse. The CIB also has agreed to pay at least $3.5 million for capital improvements at the venue.

The Pacers' lease at Conseco Fieldhouse extends through 2019, but the team has the right to opt out. In negotiations with the city, Pacers officials said they lost money every year but one since moving into the fieldhouse and could no longer afford to pay the $14 to $18 million required annually to operate the facility.

“This deal has the benefit of taking uncertainly off the table for three years,” said CIB member David Shane during board discussion of the agreement.

Shane raised the possibility that franchise owner Herb Simon might sell the team after tiring of shouldering losses. And, echoing sentiments from several other board members, Shane noted that both the city and the Pacers’ financial futures could be clearer in three years’ time.

“I don’t want to tempt fate,” Shane said. The agreement was approved by a 6-1 vote.

The sole voice of dissent belonged CIB member Douglas Brown, who acknowledged the Pacers’ value to downtown Indianapolis but preferred that the city and team craft a longer-term deal now, rather than delay for three years.

“I don’t think the environment for a long-term deal is going to get any better [than it is currently],” Brown said. “I think we need to strike while the iron is hot. … It took us two years to get this agreement. I would hate to think that we’d be perpetually in negotiations with the Pacers.”

As part of the deal, the Pacers must repay at least part of the $33.5 million if the team leaves before 2019.

A CIB-commissioned study concluded that the Pacers along with the Indiana Fever contribute an estimated $55 million a year to the Indianapolis economy.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Penalty For Moving
    Yet another article that fails to mention that the Pacers were looking at a $150 million penalty if the Simons tried to sell the team and break the lease.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT