New rules raise stakes for Lilly drug

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Drugmakers—including Eli Lilly and Co.—testing experimental Alzheimer’s medicines got good news last week when the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association proposed new guidelines to make earlier diagnoses of the disease.

If adopted, those guidelines—along with new forms of testing for Alzheimer’s—are expected to triple the prevalence of the disease, which now stands at 5.3 million Americans, according to the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions.

That’s great if you’re trying to sell a product to that market, as drugmakers are clamoring to do. They have more than 100 experimental Alzheimer’s medicines in human testing right now, according to The New York Times.

Lilly can claim four of those, including two in Phase 3 clinical trials, the last stage before seeking market approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.Those late-stage drugs attempt to block or reduce levels of protein plaques in the brain, called amyloid beta, which are thought to cause the telltale memory loss of Alzheimer’s.

But there is a problem, the Times noted in a July 16 story. The FDA says it needs to know not just that a drug reduced or even eliminated amyloid plaque, but also that patients taking the drug experienced better memory and clearer thinking. But with a slow-progressing disease like Alzheimer’s, the time it would take to document such changes could make testing too expensive for drug companies.

That’s especially the case for Lilly, which is hoping a breakthrough Alzheimer’s drug might produce the kind of blockbuster sales it needs to offset the loss of revenue from its antispychotic drug Zyprexa, which will lose its protection against cheap generic copies in October 2011.

Current medicines give only temporary relief of the symptoms of Alzheimer's, but do not appear to slow progression of the disease. That's why, even before the new recommended guidelines were announced, Barcalys Capital analyst Tony Butler predicted an Alzheimer’s drug that actually prevents or reverses the disease could fetch sales of $5 billion a year, according to Bloomberg News.

That’s roughly the amount of revenue Lilly stands to lose from its schizophrenia drug Zyprexa—and the company has few other drug candidates near enough to market approval to fill in that looming revenue gap.


  • New rules
    *New rules* includes the level playing field of the Internet.The World Wide Web enables the little guy whistle-blowers to inform on any company malfeasance,such was Zyprexa.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. "bike lanes, specialized lighting, decorative signage, public art, grass medians, trees and rain gardens" These are all nice things to have, but can we freaking get the hundreds of potholes all over the city fixed first?!?!?!!?!?!

  2. When a criminal with multiple prior convictions serves five days of a one year sentence and later kills a police officer with a weapon illegally in his posession, residents of Boone County need to pay a tax to drive to work... PERFECT Progressive logic.. If, on the other hand, a fund were to be set up to build more prisons and hire more guards to keep the known criminals off the streets, I'd be the first to contribute.

  3. Not a word about how much the taxpayers will be ripped off on this deal. Crime spirals out of control and the the social problems that cause it go unheeded by an administration that does not give a rats behind about the welfare of our citizens. There is no money for police or plowing snow (remember last winter) or or or or, but spend on a sports complex, and the cash flows out of the taxpayers pockets. This city is SICK

  4. Sounds like a competitor just wanted to cause a problem. I would think as long as they are not "selling" the alcohol to the residents it is no different than if I serve wine to dinner guests. With all the violent crime happening I would think they should turn their attention to real criminals. Let these older residents enjoy what pleasures they can. Then again those boozed up residents may pose a danger to society.

  5. Where did the money go from the 2007 Income tax increase for public safety that the Mayor used to stir opposition and win the election and then failed to repeal (although he promised he would when he was running for election)? Where did the money go from the water utility sale? Where did the money go from the parking meter deal? Why does the money have all these funds for TIF deals and redevelopment of Mass avenue, and subsidy for luxury high rises, parking garages in Broad Ripple, and granola chain grocery stores but can not find the money to take care of public safety. Commuters shouldn't have to pay the tax of failed leadership in Marion County by leaders that commuters have no say in electing. Taxation without representation.