IBJNews

TV ratings for Pacers on the upswing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Through the first four games of the season, television ratings for the Indiana Pacers on the Fox Sports Indiana cable channel are up more than 10 percent.

The season opener at San Antonio Oct. 27 earned a 2.7 rating in Indianapolis according to Nielsen Media Research, up 11 percent over last year’s season opener at Atlanta (2.45) and up 26 percent over the 2008-09 opener at Detroit (2.2).

The Pacers' home opener on Oct. 30 against Philadelphia earned a 3.3 household rating, up 19 percent from last year.

Each rating point equals 10,720 central Indiana households, meaning 35,400 households tuned in to the home opener.

Fox officials pointed out that this year’s home opener went head-to-head with the third game of the Major League Baseball World Series and plenty of college football, whereas last year’s was played on a Friday night and did not. The Pacers' season opener went head-to-head with Game 1 of the World Series.

David Morton, president of local marketing firm Sunrise Sports Group, said he isn’t surprised by the early ratings increase.

“Central Indiana is hungry for the Pacers to do well,” he said. “There’s no shortage of Pacers fans here and they’ve been waiting for something to cheer about. Now, with the acquisition of Darren Collison, the emergence of Roy Hibbert and Danny Granger’s involvement with the U.S. team in the world championships, they have something to be excited about.”

Though it's early in the 82-game season, Fox General Manager Jack Donovon thinks the early numbers are an encouraging sign and an indication of things to come.

“As we’ve seen, the Pacers will play an exciting style of basketball,” Donovon said in a prepared statement. “And having every Fox Sports Indiana telecast in [high-definition] this season may bring more viewers to Pacers basketball.”

Fox Sports will air 72 of the team’s 82 regular-season home games. This is the first season all of them will be available in high-definition.

“This high-definition announcement marks a major milestone for Fox Sports Indiana,” Donovan said. “HD telecasts are especially effective in showcasing the athleticism and excitement of NBA basketball.”

A dispute between Fox and Dish Network officials threatened to ding Fox’s ratings. When the two sides couldn’t agree on a financial arrangement, Dish pulled 19 regional Fox Sports cable channels from its lineup Oct. 1. A settlement was reached Oct. 29, and Fox Sports can now be seen in the homes of 100,000 Dish TV subscribers statewide.

The National Basketball Association's TV ratings as a whole are on the rise this year. Sports marketers credit some of the ratings boost to an increasing level of player involvement in social media such as Twitter and Facebook.

In addition, the high-profile moves of LeBron James and Chris Bosh to the Miami Heat to team up with Dwayne Wade, Shaquille O’Neal’s acquisition by the Boston Celtics, and the Los Angeles Lakers' attempt at winning three straight titles has ratcheted up interest.

TNT's exclusive doubleheader coverage of NBA opening night, which included a Miami-Boston matchup, delivered record-setting ratings and audience share for the cable network, with more than 4 million households tuning in.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT