IBJOpinion

WRIGHT: Schoolchildren need better advocates

Greg Wright
November 27, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WrightThe Legislature needs to fix two systemic problems causing Indiana’s public schools to fall behind and cost too much:

First, the overwhelming majority of Indiana’s public schools are controlled by school superintendents and licensed administrators, not elected school boards. Second, superintendents and school district administrators are simply too close to teachers’ union bosses.

The organizations that dominate, train and speak for superintendents, school administrators and school board members march in lock step. They do not function independently.

The Indiana Association of Public School Superintendents, Indiana Association of School Business Officials and the Indiana School Board Association are all three at 1 N. Capitol Ave., Suite 1215. They share the same office suite, receptionist, kitchen, coffeepot and staff. In practice, the leadership and agendas of the superintendents, licensed administrators and school board organizations are indistinguishable.

When registered lobbyists from any of these three organizations speak to the press or the Legislature, they are speaking for all three organizations. Can you ever recall when they had any conflict? These groups clearly do not represent the taxpayers. These groups do not represent the children and place their interests first. They represent the adult members with special interests.

Superintendents and school administrators are all licensed teachers. The pay and benefits contained in their individual contracts generally are based on a teachers’ contract. At the termination of their contracts, they can go back to teaching. When school districts downsize, some administrators go back to teaching and bump classroom teachers to the unemployment lines.

Imagine an auto manufacturer where all levels of management started out as a United Auto Workers union member, where its management is paid based on the union contract, and where its board of directors is trained by former UAW union members. That’s the situation of Indiana’s public school districts.

My experience has been that the political campaigns for most successful school board candidates have been financed by the teachers’ union, and that most of their poll volunteers were members of the teachers’ union. Former teachers’ union boss Albert Shanker put it this way, “When schoolchildren start paying union dues, that’s when I’ll start representing the interests of schoolchildren.”

If Indiana is to move ahead, our schoolchildren need independent representation. Since local school boards cannot fix these problems, citizens must look to the Indiana General Assembly for a solution.

The following changes would help pull this important public institution out of the ditch:

• Allow all K-12 children to enroll in any public school, including charter schools, in any school district in their county of residency.

• The money must follow the child.

• Provide children travel vouchers for transportation to any public school within their county of residency.

• Move school board elections from May to November.

• Make all school district employees (including teachers) state government employees and provide them with the same benefits currently provided other state employees.

• Require all school employees and school board members to adhere to the same ethics rules as all other Indiana government employees.

• Require public schools to transfer vacant school classroom buildings to certified charter schools.

Be careful. If we do not adopt the complete treatment regiment described above, we will fail. Piecemeal changes will result in only a temporary setback for these special interests. If allowed, they will simply regroup and resume the largesse for the adults, and our children will continue being the victims of the system.•

__________

Wright is a former elected member of the MSD Washington Township Board of Education. He is a certified fraud examiner specializing in financial fraud.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • When you're Wright, you're right
    As a matter of "public education," Indy Don is right, there is no colussion between superintendents & business officials (whatever that means); only collusion.

    "Business officials?" Hybrid inbred?
  • Wright is Right
    To exercise a choice to leave a failed governent school should not be abrogated by denying the kid the means of getting to said school. A District is only a local monopoly with ALL of the defects of monopolies. The interest of the State is in having a well instructed citizenry able to read, write, and calculate. The Legislature has come to realize, we hope, that their previous system does NOT EVEN COME CLOSE to achieving any of those goals. So, the means of delivery needs to be improved-elimination of monopoly is so obvious that Indy Don probably needs to go back to school. Just because we have had decades of mediocrity from government schools with it's attendent costs, actual and social, does not mean that we should preserve a stupidity. There is no excuse that we have not heard ad nasuam from so-called "educators". Show us the goods! We define "the goods" as the 3 R's and pack your bags if you can't deliver them!
  • Gre3g Wright is wrong
    The positions taken by Greg Wright are only partly correct. The last legislature allowed for students and families to select any school in the state and the state payment would follow them. Transportation is another problem, but there should be no reason for transportation to follow the out of district choices. As for his claim that school boards, superintendents and business officials are all in colussion, that is a bunch of malarky. I don't know what Greg is trying to accomplish, but he is all wrong.
  • I Agree
    I agree with the recommendations. The situation where superintendents all but wrong the school boards is a particular problem. Many of these elected school boards are just rubber stamps for whatever the superintendent wants to do.

    Moving the election to the Fall would really help. Right now it's hard for candidates not endorsed by the superintendents to win given the small turnout in a primary.
  • Common Sense
    Greg Wright is right.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT