IBJNews

Two more WellPoint executives set to depart

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc.’s management team will shrink to eight following the departures of two more top executives.

Cynthia Miller, the health insurer’s chief actuary, and Bradley Fluegel, chief strategy officer, are both leaving the company, according to a WellPoint securities document filed Thursday. It did not precisely say when the officers would leave the Indianapolis-based company.

Both executives, along with CEO Angela Braly, played prominent public roles when the company became the center of controversy in the health care reform debate.

Miller appeared with Braly before Congress to defend premium hikes on individual customers in California.

Fluegel handled WellPoint’s government relations during the 10-month reform debate. That debate ended with President Obama signing a mammoth bill in March—six weeks after he revived it by painting WellPoint as the poster child for health insurers’ bad behavior.

“WellPoint is making several management changes as it prepares for 2011 and positions the organization to deliver even greater health care value in a post health care reform operating environment,” WellPoint’s securities filing said. “These changes will help WellPoint streamline its operations and lower administrative costs by consolidating work for greater efficiency and effectiveness.”

Miller and Fluegel’s departures follow the exit of Dijuana Lewis, who clashed with Braly after Braly shifted some of Lewis’ duties to another executive, Lori Beer. In October Lewis was terminated “without cause” but was helping with the transition of her duties to others within the company.

In place of Miller, WellPoint Chief Financial Officer Wayne DeVeydt will assume responsibility for the Actuarial group.

Fluegel’s government relations and communications duties will be assumed by General Counsel John Cannon and his strategic and marketing oversight will be handled by Brian Sassi, WellPoint’s president of consumer business.

In addition on Thursday, WellPoint it will back its annual profit forecast during meetings with analysts and investors over the next few days.

The company said in November that it expected a profit of at least $6.60 per share in 2010. In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, WellPoint said it will maintain that forecast. Its estimate includes gains on investments worth 18 cents per share, and an asset impairment charge of 3 cents per share.

Analysts expect a profit of $6.54 per share, according to Thomson Reuters.

WellPoint's stock was down $1.36, or 2.3 percent, in mid-morning trading, to $57.08 per share.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Direction not Duties
    The clash between Braly and Lewis had to do with direction and culture not duties. Stop misrepresenting the truth without knowing the facts.
  • Real question
    How much are they getting as they leave? I'm sure they will be leaving with a pocket full of our money!
  • The question is:
    Where are they going? Are they going to be rewarded by the Obama admin. for their role in pushing the egregious health care bill through?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT