EDITORIAL: Airport victory just a warm-up

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Not all success stories are flashy. Witness the quiet resurrection of the former United Airlines maintenance facility at Indianapolis International Airport.

When United announced in 1993 it would build its 1.7-million-square-foot, state-of-the-art repair base here, it was billed as one of the biggest economic development victories in the city’s history.

A decade later, the celebratory mood of the early 1990s was a distant memory. United, which was in bankruptcy reorganization, walked away from the facility and the promise to employ 6,300 highly paid aircraft maintenance workers there by 2004.

The $800 million project, which sucked up $300 million in state and local incentives, was officially a bust.

But the Indianapolis Airport Authority, which was saddled with the mammoth property, didn’t panic—or hang a for-sale sign in front of a building it had little hope of selling. The quasi-government agency that runs the airport instead went quietly and effectively about the business of finding new tenants. Seven years later, the airport authority is looking savvy for what it has achieved.

Though the property employs only about 1,400—not half of the 3,000 who worked there at its peak—the 12-hangar building is substantially full, and there’s even talk of expanding it.

The anchor tenant is Chicago-based AAR Corp., an aircraft parts and maintenance company that took a chance when it agreed to lease one hangar there. It now occupies 10 hangars full of a hodgepodge of jets being repaired for a host of domestic carriers and the U.S. Marines.

The balance of space in the building houses repair operations of locally based Republic Airlines, a drug packaging and shipping facility and a logistics firm that ships pharmaceuticals between Europe and Indianapolis.

The maintenance center isn’t just full; it’s eking out a profit. Operating expenses have been slashed from $15 million a year when United was running the show to $8.3 million under the airport authority. Revenue for 2010 is projected at $8.8 million.

The maintenance facility’s resurgence is a testament to the effectiveness of the airport authority, which now faces a challenge even more daunting than an empty, cavernous maintenance center.

Later this month, the airport authority will release a land use plan that will guide the development of 80,000 acres of airport property for the next 30 to 50 years. Included in the plan are the land and buildings vacated two years ago with the opening of the midfield terminal.

The challenges—and the opportunities—are immense. Decisions the airport authority makes over the next few years have the potential to put the airport on sound financial footing for years to come and could convert relics of the city’s aviation past into a magnet for economic growth.

We hope the rebirth of the maintenance base is a hint of what’s to come.•


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.