IBJNews

Indianapolis customers line up for Verizon iPhone

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Customers waiting outside the Verizon Wireless store in Castleton early Thursday wanted two things: iPhones and warmth.

The 10 people lined up 45 minutes before the earlier-than-normal 7 a.m. opening were tightly bundled. One woman waited in the warmth of her car while her son stood in line for her. The below-zero temperatures bit at the skin of those huddled outside.

So Mary Riley, a 13-year Verizon employee, brought out some hand warmers.

“Let’s keep you warm,” she said.

Inside waited Starbucks coffee and, of course, the iPhone 4. Verizon started selling the much-heralded smart phone in their stores Thursday after Apple’s exclusive deal with AT&T ended.

Indianapolis customer Meka Anderson, sheltered in a thick, orange jacket with a fur-lined hood, didn’t want to wait any longer than she’d already had to.

“I had Verizon before, and I’ve never, ever lost a call, so I didn’t want to pay the fee to switch over to AT&T,” said Anderson, 29.  “I thought it was going to be long lines, and I didn’t want it to be sold out and then wait weeks to get one.”

Ted Wendling, Verizon’s district manager of retail sales for northeast Indianapolis, said the frigid temperatures might have kept some people from lining up early. However, he doesn’t expect that to affect sales for the day.

“We know that there’s been a lot of pent-up demand for it, and we know that it’s going to be a popular choice amongst a lot of our customers,” said Wendling, an employee at Verizon for nearly 20 years. “They have been loyal to Verizon Wireless because they trust in the network reliability that we do offer. Now, we just have another device to add to our portfolio.”

Verizon began online iPhone sales for existing customers Feb. 3 and had to stop taking orders temporarily after selling out a limited supply. The company did not say how many devices had been ordered, but said it sold more phones in two hours than it had in the full day of any previous phone launch.

AT&T activated 15.2 million iPhones last year. Analyst estimates for Verizon iPhone sales this year vary widely, from 5 million to 13 million. Observers expect the sales to Verizon subscribers will be strong, but the big question is how many iPhone buyers will be jumping ship from other carriers.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Haha
    Standing out in below zero temps for an IPhone...i've got two words for those people...STUPID

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT