LOU'S VIEWS: IU Opera premieres 'Vincent'

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

As ambitious an arts project as you are likely to find so far this century in central Indiana, IU Opera’s world premiere production of “Vincent” (through April 17) overflowed with stunning design and strong music. And the opening weekend brought both journalists and opera producers from around the country to Bloomington to see what composer Bernard Rands and librettist J.D. McClatchy have created. National press is already starting to hit.

Vincent IU Opera David Moore, plays tormented artist Vincent van Gogh, sharing the stage with outstanding visuals. (IU Photographic Services)

To be clear, Rands and McClatchy are heavy hitters. A 1984 Pulitzer Prize winner for “CantidelSole” and 2000 Grammy winner for “Cantid’Amor,” Rands has written for orchestras around the world, including a seven-year stint as composer-in-residence for the Philadelphia Orchestra. Conductor Riccardo Muti will be premiering Rands’ “DanzaPetrificada” with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra in May.

McClatchy is no slouch in the words department, either, having provided English versions of “The Magic Flute” and “The Barber of Seville” for the Metropolitan Opera. He also penned the libretto for Ned Rorem’s “Our Town” and spent the last 20 years serving as editor of The Yale Review.

I’ll leave it to others better versed to comment in detail on the intricacies of the music itself. I will say, though, that within minutes Rands relaxed anyone who thought the term “contemporary opera” had to be synonymous with atonal, dissonant, “difficult” music. “Who cares if you listen?” composer Milton Babbitt famously said (and, interestingly, is quoted in the latest IU Music magazine in an article unrelated to “Vincent”). His argument: Why should contemporary musicians be any more understandable to the general public than scientists and mathematicians?

I’m thankful the Rands score attempts to probe the psychology of van Gogh in a way that doesn’t forget that we’re in the theater for a transcendent experience, not for an endurance test or to prove that we can handle serious music. While the arc of van Gogh’s life may be familiar, the hope and beauty of the music helps keep matters dramatically interesting even when the rest slows down.

Performed here with pros alternating in the leading role, students providing support, and strong performances in the orchestra pit, “Vincent” has been given a worthy launch. The setting, mostly consisting of projections that take us into van Gogh’s perception of the world, works beautifully and the choices of key scenic elements—a chair, a tree—adapted from the artists’ paintings are smart without calling too much attention to themselves.

The libretto is, on one level, admirable for sticking close to the facts as revealed primarily in the letters exchanged between Vincent and his brother Theo. And there’s no ambiguity about this portrait of the artist as a frustrated would-be missionary. The downside of such fidelity is that the truthfulness hinders the ability of the piece to soar dramatically. (Sondheim’s “Sunday in the Park with George,” another artist-focused work, would be far less interesting if it stuck to the facts of Georges Seurat’s life.)

It doesn’t help that “Vincent” employs spoken dialogue in a seemingly haphazard way. That, combined with the fact that it’s sung in English, sometimes brings the work to the neutral zone between opera and musical theater, creating dramatic demands that the work doesn’t yet satisfy.

Female characters are nearly non-existent and male supporting characters are sketchily drawn (a mature performer might have made more of fellow artist Gauguin). The lead I saw on opening night, David Adam Moore, certainly has the look of van Gogh and the pipes to deliver the music, but he often seemed like he was waiting for his orchestral dining companion to hurry up and finish the meal so they could move on. Moments where the music is gorgeous often are accompanied by actors standing on stage with little to do.

In a concert or in a recording, that wouldn’t be an issue—and I suspect the reputation for “Vincent” will grow if it does get recorded. And it should. Rands, with IU as midwife, has birthed something rare and good here. With proper nurturing, it could grow into something truly outstanding.

I hope to have the opportunity to see it again in its next incarnation.•


This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  2. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  3. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  4. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!

  5. You guys are being really rude to gays in the comments. (Not all of you, I presume). You need to stop it. Gays have just as much of a right to marry as straight people do. It's not fair how you guys are denying them equal rights. They're acting more human than you'll ever be. We obviously haven't matured since the bible was last updated. Hate the sin, not the sinner. You've all committed a sin at least once in your life. You've lied, you've stolen, etc. (Those are just possibilities). We should have a planet for people that support gay rights and a planet for people that don't. Then, gay people could get married without you bigots interfering with their love life. How would you feel if straights couldn't get married? How would you feel if teenagers were afraid to come out to their parents as straight? If straight people got hate everywhere they went? If straight people were afraid to go out in public, because they feared being judged? It's never going to happen at the rate society is going. You haven't seen the side of me where I act obscene. You're glad my inner demon hasn't been released. I would, but oh no, my comment would be removed because of my very strong emotions about this subject. I love gays, and love how they show their affection for each other. I just ADORE how a state is going to give same-sex couples a marriage license, then changes their mind. (I was obviously being sarcastic there). I just LOVE how society thinks gays are an abomination to our society. You're caring about marriage between two men or two women. That's a small thing. Just grow up, and let them marry. Let them live their lives. You can't make them change their sexuality. You can't make them change their lifestyle. In my opinion, gays are more than welcome to marry. Please, grow up and realize that people should be allowed to marry, even if it's same-sex marriage. You guys are saying that "the bible said gay marriage is wrong." Well, guess what else is wrong? Read Matthew:7 and you'll find out. (I am in no way breaking that. I am saying a fact). I'm stating that gays have just as much of a right to marry as straights do. (: