CROWTHER: The future needs a Hoosier attitude

Michael Crowther
April 23, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

CrowtherCentral Indiana is the best place I’ve ever lived and worked because we have such a great balance between our lack of cynicism and our lack of naïveté. We’re not so cynical that we believe things can’t get better, and we’re not so naïve that we think they’re bound to. I think that’s the basis for what many of us consider Hoosier values.

I’ve been a Hoosier for almost nine years, and there is no question that the behavioral culture of central Indiana is significantly different from that of the Philadelphia area, where I spent most of the previous decade. To our family, one of the most notable differences is the way in which that cultural foundation is revealed through interpersonal communication. I think there’s an underpinning of caring for our families and our communities that is perceptible to outsiders as “something different.”

There’s no question that we’re not all “the same,” but there really are Hoosier values that are revealed in our tendencies. One of those tendencies is a leaning toward thoughtfulness rather than knee-jerk reaction, another is that basic caring I mentioned, and a third is a recognition that good outcomes require some form of investment, such as work and capital.

I’m hoping those tendencies will come together to create a powerful force that will help define the future we hand off to the next generations. I believe that we owe them a future they would choose to live in, not one they are forced to endure, and I’m convinced that future should include forests, mountains and plains; rivers, lakes and oceans; butterflies, bears and belugas.

The most recent Red List of Threatened Species shows that 17,291 species out of the 47,677 assessed are threatened with extinction. And it’s not just obscure cave- or ocean-bottom-dwelling invertebrates; nearly one out of every four mammal species is at risk of disappearing forever. We need the leadership, values and commitment of our community to ensure that our wildlife heritage isn’t irreparably diminished.

The good news is that we can make a difference. I just returned from Uganda, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, where I learned that a seven-year research project has clearly demonstrated the impact of “extreme conservation” on mountain gorillas. There are only about 780 mountain gorillas left in the world, and they fall into two categories: habituated, monitored groups, and unhabituated, unmonitored animals.

The population of habituated, monitored groups has increased 29 percent over the past seven years, but the unhabituated, unmonitored groups have declined more than 5 percent. The anti-poaching patrols, veterinary intervention and other programs that Hoosiers and others are leading and supporting for the monitored groups are making a real difference.

The world’s leading award for animal conservation bears the name of our community. The Indianapolis Prize gives successful animal conservationists both a $100,000 cash award and a platform from which they can expose both their needs and their solutions. After the 2006 Indianapolis Prize Gala, an influential philanthropist approached me and said, “Mike, before tonight, I knew next to nothing about animal conservation and cared about the same amount. But going forward, I think it’s going to be the most important thing in my life.”

I am aware of a number of people from Indianapolis who have made several million dollars in direct contributions to field conservation projects, and our city’s name is becoming recognized in conservation circles throughout the world.

It’s a great start, but we have to take it further. We don’t need extremists on either end of the conservation spectrum to keep upsetting the sustainability of the natural world, though. We need futurists, people with a sense of balance, people who want generations to come to be blessed with the same riches we grew up with. That requires innovation, leadership, responsibility and thoughtful action.

In other words, I’m pretty sure the future needs more Hoosiers.•


Crowther is CEO of the Indianapolis Zoo.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.