IBJNews

$100M 'Bridges' project in Carmel wins approval

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A proposal for a roughly $100 million mix of retail, office and apartments along Springmill Road south of 116th Street won approval Monday night from the Carmel City Council.

Indianapolis-based Gershman Brown Crowley Inc. plans to build the development in phases, starting with a 250,000-square-foot retail component anchored by a grocery store.

The project, dubbed The Bridges, also calls for several outlots for restaurants, banks, a gas station and a pharmacy; about 300 apartment homes or a senior community; and room for about 500,000 square feet of office space in several buildings.

The Carmel City Council approved the project with a 6-1 vote after the developer agreed to make dozens of concessions, including adding higher berms along the perimeter of the project, reducing the height of the tallest office building to 90 feet, and contributing about $2 million for road improvements in the area.

With zoning approval in hand, Gershman Brown Crowley principal Tom Crowley said the company now plans to target a specialty grocery store such as Whole Foods to anchor the center.

The company intends to develop the entire project, potentially with partners, but does not expect to sell portions to other developers.

The 62-acre project would provide more convenient services to existing office employees on the U.S. 31 corridor, home to the state’s second-largest concentration of jobs behind downtown Indianapolis.

On the other hand, Carmel zoning maps envision residential lots on the site, and neighborhood groups put up a fight to preserve the thoroughfare’s residential character.

Those opposed to the project fear a traffic mess, and they objected to the project’s size, the inclusion of apartments, and the proposed office space—which some opponents saw as a boondoggle given already high vacancy rates.

“The project is over the top as far as size and scope,” Zak Brown, president of the Springwood Estates Neighborhood Association and CEO of a Zionsville-based motorsports marketing firm, told IBJ in April. “It feels like they’re putting a massive mall in my back yard without addressing traffic. And I don’t think any of us think it’s needed.”

Crowley said the project will be constructed based on market demand, and could take up to 15 years to build. He said the company has flexibility under a land contract with the property owners, the Pittman family, to build as the market dictates. The land is now used for agriculture.

The development is named for the old-style stone bridges the developer plans to construct over landscaped water features set to circumnavigate the site.

The project’s buildings would be prairie-style, designed by the same architects that designed Hamilton Town Center, and surrounded by bike and pedestrian paths.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • exactly
    Brandon,thats part of the problem. They DO have a comprehensive plan, and this project does not comply with it. It is not transitional, as described in the Comprehensive Plan.
  • Address Dying Property First
    I'm shocked that the Carmel City Council approved this while Merchant's Square is turning into a ghost town. They are cannibalizing themselves. The more they develop areas like this on the perimeter of Carmel, the worse off it will be for retail tenants in areas like Merchant's Square. Set a 50 year strategic plan for all of Carmel before engaging in projects like this.
    • Traffic Nightmare
      I'm not totally opposed to the project, but traffic at 116th/Spring Mill and also at 116th/Illinois is already a nightmare, even with the roundabouts that were supposed to alleviate traffic woes. Considering the amount of traffic this will generate along with existing office buildings and the hospital, I hope the engineers working on this project can do so with better results.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT