HHGregg shares plunge after rare quarterly loss

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares of electronics and appliance retailer HHGregg Inc. slumped more than 18 percent Thursday morning, to a two-year low, after the chain reported its first quarterly loss in four years.

As investors dumped shares of the fast-growing Indianapolis-based retailer, CEO Dennis L. May sought to reassure Wall Street analysts on a conference call that HHGregg's strategy remains on track. 

Among the signs of progress May noted: The chain has added a home-office business that achieved 54-percent growth in the quarter yet comprises only about 7 percent of the chain's business; HHGregg is bringing its Verizon Wireless kiosk business in-house in a move that should boost sales over time; and the chain's slew of new stores are outperforming existing ones.

The chain opened seven new stores in its fiscal first quarter, mostly in the Pittsburgh area, compared with 26 during the same period last year. It plans to open another 24 in the second quarter.

"Sales performance of our new stores remained strong and many of these stores are the best-performing amongst our chain," May said, according to a transcript of the conference call. "This is important as we continue to adapt the business to changes in consumer preferences and shopping patterns."

HHGregg reported an ugly 13.2-percent same-store sales decline for the quarter that ended June 30.

May said same-store sales figures should improve since comparisons are easier in the next few quarters. He said sales were particularly strong during the first quarter of last year because of high-volume grand openings, with "consumer demand similar to that of Black Friday."

Wall Street analysts were particularly troubled by the chain's more than 20-percent sales decline in the video category, the largest drop in more than five years, KeyBanc Capital Markets noted in a report. The chain's 12.6-percent drop in appliance sales was slightly better than KeyBanc had expected.

HHGregg's first quarter loss of $800,000, or 2 cents per share, which compares with a profit of $2.7 million, or 7 cents per share, in the same period last year, actually beat the estimate from J.P. Morgan.

But the investment bank still is keeping its "neutral" rating on the company's shares, thanks to the "discretionary and big-ticket nature of its product categories."

"We don't expect to see a relief rally in the stock and believe investors will continue to be apathetic to the growth story until comps begin to show some positive momentum," analysts at J.P. Morgan wrote in a note to investors. "While valuation might appear 'cheap' on consensus forecasts, we remain patient on recommending the name."

The company's shares traded for $10.36 apiece late Thursday morning, up from a low of $10.09 on the day. The overall market was in a swoon Thursday, with major indexes down more than 3 percent near midday.

HHGregg’s only other quarterly loss occurred in the fiscal second quarter of 2007, the year it went public, and that was caused by a special charge related to a debt refinancing.

The 13.2-percent decline in same-store sales in the quarter compared with an increase of 6.3 percent in the same period last year. The loss was steeper than the 10.8-percent decrease in same-store sales HHGregg reported in the previous quarter.

The company also attributed the quarterly loss to an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses, a decrease in the gross margin and additional advertising expenses.

The chain, founded in 1955, operates 190 stores in 15 states.


  • writing on the wall
    After last quarter results, I said this will be Krispy Kreme all over (declining same store sales, but aggressively opening new stores). In other words, I can see bankruptcy/restructuring in the mid-term.
  • Tough Market
    This is a very competitive category right now. Doug is right, you have to be able to compete in every area. Bestbuy is now struggling. Walmart continues to expand electronics and where people don't need or want consultive selling - Walmart wins on price. I would like to see Gregg do well but with the economy staggering and the competition, it is going to be tough.
  • One Word: Ecommerce
    Oh how I've tried to use the HHGregg website to find and order equipment... but within a few clicks, I'm back over to Best Buy. We work in the retail commerce space online with several clients and the retail clients that are doing well right now all have one thing in common - a great online strategy that includes SEO, Conversion Optimization, Great product search and categorization tools, mobile optimization, and speedy sites. HHGregg is a fantastic organization - but their online presence will be their downfall unless they invest millions in it.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.