IBJNews

WOJTOWICZ: Character always counts—even in loan decisions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Jean Wojtowicz

Q: I recently was refused a loan for my small business, even though I met almost all the bank’s criteria: I had a strong business plan, good credit history and so forth. Despite this, the banker I spoke with said his bank was concerned that I had not been in my industry (though my company is successful) for a long time. I was totally surprised and upset. What can I do now?

A: During these difficult times, lenders are looking harder at intangibles. At the end of the day, it is cash flow that will repay the loan. The collateral and personal guaranty are nice, but cash flow is king. And you as the primary decision maker will determine how that cash flow is allocated. It is your basic moral character that will determine if you spend this money as intended (for loan payments and other essential items).

You might ask: What are the intangibles that will overcome—from the lender’s point of view—a good business plan and credit history?

A senior lender has told me that a borrower’s character is the most important consideration. Your banker apparently determined that your job history was an important character trait that did not match the bank’s criteria.

Lenders actually run into this type of situation fairly often. Many people start small businesses after gaining experience in a different line of work or moving from another part of the country or even other countries. It’s harder for a local banker to get a good handle on a business owner with a spotty job history or few references, so they look intensely at what they can learn about a person’s character.

I’ve talked with bankers, many of whom are now retired, who recall bygone days in rural and small town banks. Bankers knew their customers, their families and reputations. It was easier to judge character because people interacted frequently in business and social or community settings.

Now, bankers tell me that they probably don’t know a potential borrower until they walk in and ask for a loan. In other words, a banker is asked to place a bet on the borrowers most likely to pay back a loan, and they may not have much information to work with.

When you ask for a loan, they may actually Google your name and explore Facebook for clues on how to judge your character. This seems over-the-top, but these social media are tools that did not exist a decade or so ago and some bankers use them to gather information, especially if other data is lacking. Is there a chance a careless photo or some past history make you seem untrustworthy to handle a bank’s money?

It all boils down to the essentials: You get one opportunity to make a good first impression. When you are ready to approach another banker, make an appointment, but don’t lay on the business plan and its fancy graphics first.

Before your appointment, write several talking points to take with you—and commit them to memory. Be sure to highlight some of your past success and try to make the link that this pattern of achievement will continue. Know the details of your business and be ready to answer the banker’s questions. Offer the business plan after you and the lender get to know each other and you’ve answered relevant questions. Then the lender will have a better idea of your character.

Times are difficult right now, and bankers simply believe that borrowers with strong character will do everything possible to avoid defaulting, even under stressful conditions.

Character has always counted. Our fragmented society places a premium on a reputation for good character while making it hard to establish one and difficult for lenders to discern where to place their money.

_____

Wojtowicz is president of Cambridge Capital Management Corp.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Now if he'd just stay there...

  2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

  3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

  4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

  5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.

ADVERTISEMENT