IBJNews

WellPoint's 3rd-quarter profit falls, but beats analyst estimates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Third-quarter profit fell nearly 8 percent at WellPoint Inc. but exceeded the expectations of Wall Street analysts.

And the Indianapolis-based health insurer raised its profit forecast for the rest of the year, the company announced Wednesday morning.

WellPoint earned $683.2 million, down 7.6 percent from the same quarter a year ago, when WellPoint earned $739.1 million.

On a per-share basis, the results appear better because WellPoint has repurchased nearly 42 million shares in the past year, a 10-percent reduction of its shares outstanding.

In the third quarter, the company recorded per-share profit of $1.90. Excluding investment gains, the company would have earned $1.77 per share, 3 cents higher than the in third quarter last year.

Analysts were expecting $1.68 per share, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

WellPoint’s operating revenue in the quarter rose nearly 6 percent, to $15.16 billion, narrowly topping analysts’ forecast of $15.12 billion.

The company's stock was up nearly 2 percent in late-morning trading, to $68.30 per share.

"We added 169,000 medical members during the third quarter and have now grown by more than one million members on a year-to-date basis, while reducing selling, general and administrative expenses by $185 million, or nearly 3 percent,” noted CEO Angela Braly in a prepared statement.

WellPoint now provides health benefits for 34.4 million people, more than any other U.S. company.

Excluding investment gains, WellPoint expects to report full-year profit of at least $6.90 per share and as much as $7.00 per share. In July, the company set its profit forecast in a range of $6.75 to $6.90.

WellPoint’s stock price has risen 18 percent this year, with another 1-percent return from dividends.

WellPoint reported its second-strongest quarter of enrollment growth in the last three years, benefiting from the $800 million acquisition of CareMore Health Group and increases in its smaller business and senior market, said Jason Gurda, an analyst at Leerink Swann in New York.

Braly said the company was happy with the growth in its senior market and is looking to make more investment in it through acquisitions and expanding its CareMore clinics. She said WellPoint will add a dozen facilities in 2012.

“The senior business is where we’re looking to make investment, growing it both organically and through acquisition,” Braly said on the analyst conference call.

The enrollment gains include a jump of 99,000 in small-business membership, mostly from companies with fewer than a 1,000 employees, said Sarah James, an analyst at Wedbush Securities Inc. in Los Angeles. The enrollment also was boosted by 89,000 in new seniors, including 57,000 that came from CareMore, WellPoint said. The insurer bought the senior-focused clinic network in June.

“We began to get hints of enrollment gains last year,” said Thomas A. Carroll, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus & Co. in Baltimore. “I think it’s a reflection that the economy may be improving as employers begin to hire again. It looks like a good, clean quarter for WellPoint.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • That is such a shame
    I really hate to hear that they only made 682 million. They can't even pay their employees a decent salary and not to mention their own medical plan for their employees sucks!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT