IBJNews

Ortho firms pull back on doc payments

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The orthopedic implant industry dialed back its payments to orthopedic surgeons after settling a federal lawsuit in 2007 that accused the companies of paying kickbacks to the surgeons for using the companies' hip and knee implants.

A total of 939 orthopedic surgeons received $198 million in 2007, according to a new report in the Archives of Internal Medicine. A year later, 526 surgeons received payments worth $119 million, plus $109 million in royalty buyouts from Zimmer.

Researchers analyzed data released by the three industry giants based in Warsaw—Biomet Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and Zimmer Holdings Inc.—as well as their rivals Stryker Corp., based in Kalamazoo, Mich.; and Smith & Nephew plc, based in the United Kindgom.

The orthopedic companies describe their payments—made to a fraction of the 25,000 orthopedic surgeons nationally—as compensation for consulting, research and clinical trials, or as royalties on products they helped develop.

The number of payments in excess of $1 million didn’t change substantially from year to year, but the companies sharply cut their fees to surgeons who received the smallest amounts, lead researcher Jason Hockenberry, a professor of health policy and management at Emory University, told Bloomberg News.

In 2007, the orthopedic device makers agreed to pay $311 million to settle U.S. Department of Justice claims that they paid kickbacks to surgeons in exchange for exclusively using their products. Prosecutors deferred criminal charges against the companies and required them to disclose the amounts they pay doctors on their corporate websites.

Bill Kolter, Biomet’s vice president for government and public affairs, told Bloomberg that manufacturers can’t develop or evaluate new devices without working with orthopedic surgeons.

“The contributions that result from such collaborations add tremendous value to the health of patients and to the economics of the health-care system,” Kolter wrote in an e-mail.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am a Lyft driver who is a licensed CDL professional driver. ALL Lyft drivers take pride in providing quality service to the Indianapolis and surrounding areas, and we take the safety of our passengers and the public seriously.(passengers are required to put seat belts on when they get in our cars) We do go through background checks, driving records are checked as are the personal cars we drive, (these are OUR private cars we use) Unlike taxi cabs and their drivers Lyft (and yes Uber) provide passengers with a clean car inside and out, a friendly and courteous driver, and who is dressed appropriately and is groomed appropriately. I go so far as to offer mints, candy and/or small bottle of water to the my customers. It's a mutual respect between driver and passenger. With Best Regards

  2. to be the big fish in the little pond of IRL midwest racin' when yer up against Racin' Gardner

  3. In the first sentance "As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss are build quality & price." need a way to edit

  4. As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss is build quality & price. First none of these places is worth $1100 for a one bedroom. Downtown Carmel or Keystone at the Crossing in Indy. It doesn't matter. All require you to get in your car to get just about anywhere you need to go. I'm in one of the Carmel apartments now where after just 2.5 short years one of the kitchen cabinet doors is crooked and lawn and property maintenance seems to be lacking my old Indianapolis apartment which cost $300 less. This is one of the new star apartments. As they keep building throughout the area "deals" will start popping up creating shoppers. If your property is falling apart after year 3 what will it look like after year 5 or 10??? Why would one stay here if they could move to a new Broad Ripple in 2 to 3 years or another part of the Far Northside?? The complexes aren't going to let the "poor" move in without local permission so that's not that problem, but it the occupancy rate drops suddenly because the "Young" people moved back to Indy then look out.

  5. Why are you so concerned about Ace hardware? I don't understand why anyone goes there! Every time ive gone in the past, they don't have what I need and I end up going to the big box stores. I understand the service aspect and that they try to be helpful but if they are going to survive I think they might need to carry more specialty parts.

ADVERTISEMENT