DINING: Harry & Izzy's, 96th Street Steakburgers offer mixed bag to flyers

Andrea Muirragui Davis
December 15, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

Our month-long look at airport dining continues this week with a peek into the concourses, those post-security areas accessible only to travelers with boarding passes. We had special dispensation — and escorts with badges who were kind enough not to blow our cover.

First up: Concourse A, home base for Northwest, Continental and Delta airlines as well as international arrivals. We eschewed the well-known (T.G.I. Fridays) and more obscure (Green Leafs & Bananas, a salad-and-smoothie joint) national chains in favor of a couple homegrown hangouts.

We started with a sit-down meal at Harry & Izzy's, the upscale offspring of Indy's famed St. Elmo Steakhouse. Our server wore the signature grey cotton jacket, her airport ID the only clue that we weren't in Kansas anymore.

The menu is smaller than Harry & Izzy's downtown location, but it has the important stuff: St. Elmo's signature shrimp cocktail ($15) and an array of liquid courage from the bar. Since we were on the clock, we opted to eat our lunch, not drink it.

Service was solicitous and speedy, saving us from any worries had we been there to catch a flight. Our only nervous moment was when we realized we'd blown our $50 budget on our first stop.

The highlight of our meal was the starter — shrimp topped with the sinus-clearing cocktail sauce delivered the punch we expected and primed us for what was to come.

I tried the Prime Rib Sandwich ($15), which was served with tasty hand-cut fries and au jus for dipping. The thinly sliced beef had a nice flavor and the soft foccacia bun held together well even after a good soak. My only quibble: the creamy horseradish sauce seemed downright bland, especially after the appetizer.

My companion built her own entree, combining a salad and appetizer. Her Romaine Hearts salad ($10) was OK, if nothing special; apples and candied walnuts were a nice addition to the Romaine, but there was too much raspberry vinaigrette. The Toasted Ravioli ($8) was better, with a crispy shell that gave way to warm, comfort food-ish ricotta. Dragged through the tangy marinara ... mmm, bellissima.

Our second stop was 96th Street Steakburgers, located just past the moving sidewalk at Gate A10. It's an order-at-the-counter, get-a-bag-to-go joint, and after jockeying for position in line, we ordered a Steakburger with Cheese ($2.99) and Fries ($1.99). We also asked for a side of cheese sauce, which costs extra, but didn't get it. Then again, we didn't pay for it either.

We took a few bites of the meal to get a feel for the fresh-from-the-grill flavor, then bundled up our bag to see if the food would last through boarding and takeoff. It didn't stand the test of time. When it was hot, the burger was fine, if a bit dry. The fries were adequate. But 30 minutes later, neither was particularly appealing.

I made a follow-up visit to another location and noticed a sign on the drive-through window warning customers that the restaurant's fresh-cut fries are best eaten immediately. If there's a sign like that at the airport outlet, I missed it.

Nothing in Concourse A trip your trigger? No worries. Once you pass through security, you can take a left and take a shortcut to the other side. Handy.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.