IBJNews

Franciscan among Medicare's first accountable care groups

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Franciscan Alliance’s Indianapolis-area hospitals have been named one of the nation’s first 32 accountable care organizations, federal Medicare officials announced Monday.

Accountable care organizations, or ACOs, are one of the key elements of the 2010 health care overhaul designed to rein in galloping increases in health care spending. Hospitals in Indiana have spoken positively about the concept, but only Franciscan Alliance has applied and won admission to the program.

Beginning on Jan. 1, Franciscan will take responsibility for providing high-quality care for 22,000 Medicare patients in central Indiana. If it also spends less money than in the past caring for those patients, Medicare will give some of those savings back to Franciscan as a bonus payment. But if Franciscan spends more money than before, it will have some of its Medicare payments reduced.

The Pioneer ACO program pledges Franciscan to enter similar relationships with other health plans. And in the third year of the program, Medicare could give Franciscan a per-patient payment for a year’s worth of care. Franciscan then would bear the risk of caring for its patients for that amount.

Those methods of payment differ radically from Medicare's current practice, which is simply to pay doctors and hospitals a pre-determined fee for every procedure they perform. That practice is almost universally cited as a reason health care spending rises significantly faster than overall inflation.

“From an industry perspective, the ACO model encourages organizations such as hospitals, physician practices, and other healthcare providers to collaborate closely, thus bringing down the overall costs of medical care,” Jennifer Westfall, executive director of the Franciscan Alliance ACO, said in a prepared statement.

Franciscan’s ACO initially will include hospitals in Beech Grove, Indianapolis and Mooresville, as well as more than 700 physicians. Of those doctors, 180 are employed by Franciscan and the rest, while independent, have agreed to work together to coordinate patient care as part of the ACO.

Some of Franciscan Alliance’s 11 other hospitals may join the ACO effort at a later time, said Joe Stuteville, a spokesman for Mishawaka-based Franciscan Alliance.

The federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services named ACOs in 18 states Monday. Collectively, they will manage care for 860,000 patients. Over five years, CMS estimates, these ACOs could achieve savings of $1.1 billion.

“These Pioneer ACOs represent our nation’s leaders in health systems innovation, providing highly coordinated care for patients at lower costs,” said Marilyn Tavenner, acting administrator of Medicare, in a prepared statement.

Other hospital systems participating in the Pioneer ACO program include Minneapolis-based Allina Hospitals & Clinics, Boston-based Partners Healthcare, and the University of Michigan Health System.

The Pioneer ACO program is distinct from the Medicare Shared Savings program created by the 2010 health law. Rather, it is a test of a particular payment method using the ACO concept. Medicare is trying to work out terms of the ACO and shared savings concepts to entice enough hospitals to participate. Some hospitals have been reluctant to sign up because the program requires significant investments and offers uncertain rewards.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Patient committed
    Other hospital networks have applied but have not been asked to be in the pilot ACO
  • Win?
    "only Franciscan Alliance has applied and won admission to the program"

    Not sure I'd call that a "win" at all.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT