IBJNews

Political neophyte Ballard cruises to second term

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Year In Review
More
Stories
State's economy stuck
                              in neutral Indictment: Durham looted Fair Finance Ballard cruises to second term City backs string of high-profile projects Manning's injury sends Colts into tailspin Downtown mall stung by loss of Nordstrom Right-to-work battle derails legislative session General Assembly overhauls K-12 education Real estate meltdown leaves developers reeling Spate of Indiana firms lines up for IPOs Rolls-Royce relocated 2,500 jobs to downtown Openings launch new era for tourism biz Patent expirations up pressure on Lilly Las Vegas crash saps IndyCar momentum


Newsmakers
Simon
                              takes on Amazon.com Melangton Daniels White in crosshairs as reformers target IPS

A contentious battle for Indianapolis mayor culminated in a second term for Republican Mayor Greg Ballard, who won the race with 51 percent of the vote. His Democratic challenger, Melina Kennedy, garnered 47 percent.

Ballard, who won his first political victory in a huge 2007 upset against two-term incumbent Bart Peterson, maintained his appeal as a political outsider and moderate Republican, which helped him in an election that otherwise brought strong Democratic victories.

Democrats swept control of the City-County Council, winning all four at-large seats and capturing seats in tossup districts such as the Beech Grove area to gain a 16-13 edge.

 During the race, Ballard touted his administration’s fiscal restraint; initiation of public-safety reforms; and spending to repair roads, bridges and other infrastructure as selling points for his re-election. Ballard’s first term included sizable initiatives such as the sale of the city’s water and sewer utilities, the long-term lease of Indianapolis’ parking meters and plans for a large development on the south side of downtown near Eli Lilly’s campus.

Kennedy, a former deputy mayor under Peterson, made K-12 education the centerpiece of her campaign, pledging to make it a top priority if elected. She also rolled out plans to spend proceeds from the utilities sale on early childhood education, crime prevention and job training, and attacked Ballard’s record on issues such as public safety and economic development.

Observers said Kennedy’s negative approach—and potentially her gender—hurt her in the race.

In his next term, Ballard is expected to focus on initiatives to rejuvenate the urban areas just outside downtown to the borders of Interstate 465. Community leaders have promoted ideas for improving mass transit and channeling utilities sale money toward neighborhood projects, ideas that Ballard has supported.

They’ve also discussed plans for decentralizing Indianapolis Public Schools, but Ballard has not yet weighed in on those plans.

The new council dynamics—with Democrats strongly in the majority—will test Ballard’s ability to reach across the aisle. If he is unable or unwilling to do so, he risks getting little accomplished in his second term.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Actually...
    what cost Melina Kennedy the election was certainly not being "negative," but that she refused to attack Ballard on the things he was the most vulnerable on - corporate welfare and insider deals. She never hit Ballard on the $33.5 million giveaway to the Pacers wile libraries were closing and the parks budget was slashed. She didn't hit him on the ACS 50 year parking meter deal, the Broad Ripple Parking Garage that enriches Keystone, or many of the other insider deals.. She had so much ammunition and never fired a shot.

    The fact is both parties are deeply involved with those insider deals, and she as an insider herself, wasn't going to upset the apple cart by going after them even though Ballard was vulnerable on those issues.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Now if he'd just stay there...

  2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

  3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

  4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

  5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.

ADVERTISEMENT