Ryan's, Old Country Buffet parent files for bankruptcy

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Buffets Restaurants Holdings Inc. has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for a second time and plans to close 81 underperforming restaurants as it tries to cope with its debt.

The company, based in Eagan, Minn., operates 494 restaurants in 38 states under names such as Old Country Buffet, Ryan's, HomeTown Buffet, and Tahoe Joe's Famous Steakhouse restaurant.

Its restaurant lineup includes Ryan's locations in Indianapolis at 655 N. Shadeland Ave. and 8180 U.S. 31 South. There also is a Ryan's in Anderson at 6315 Scatterfield Road.

Several Old Country Buffets that previously operated in Indianapolis have already closed.

The company is expected to announce within a week which restaurants will close.

Buffets said that its decision to file on Wednesday with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware marks the beginning of a new era for the company and is the result of a strategic review that the company's board began in May.

The company said that investors who hold 83 percent of its senior debt have agreed to a restructuring that will eliminate nearly all of its $245 million in debt in exchange for all the equity in the company. That would free up cash flow for the company to invest in improving its restaurants.

Buffets said it expects to emerge from bankruptcy within six months.

The company filed for bankruptcy protection in 2008 as it struggled with debt and the impact of the recession on consumers. Buffets is one of several restaurant chains that have struggled over the past few years as consumers cut spending and began eating at home more often.

Restaurant companies such as Friendly's Ice Cream Corp., Perkins & Marie Callender's, Real Mex and the SSI Group Holding Corp., which operates Souper Salad and Grandy's restaurants, have all filed for bankruptcy protection in recent years.

Buffets said it has secured a $50 million debtor-in-possession loan that, along with cash, will allow it to meet its normal operating costs during the restructuring process.


Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.