IBJNews

Poet LLC putting plan for ethanol pipeline on hold

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The nation's largest ethanol company, Poet LLC, announced Friday that it is putting on hold its plan to build a dedicated ethanol pipeline because of the lack of prospects for a federal loan guarantee.

Sioux Falls-based Poet and Magellan Midstream Partners LP had been studying the feasibility of a $3.5 billion, 1,800-mile pipeline that would send ethanol from plants in Iowa, South Dakota, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio to distribution terminals in the northeastern United States.

Magellan announced it was placing its interest in the project on hold early last year.

Jeff Broin, Poet's chief executive, said the pipeline is a viable project that would have tremendous benefits for the country.

"But with little prospects for a federal loan guarantee in the near future we are currently focused on other efforts." Broin said in a statement.

A 2010 Department of Energy study suggested that a dedicated ethanol pipeline could be profitable if the biofuel expanded beyond its use as a 10-percent additive in standard cars. That would come from a transition to a 15-percent blend in standard cars or a greatly expanded use of E85, an 85-percent blend that runs in flexible fuel vehicles.

But the DOE study also noted several barriers.

Ethanol tends to cause more internal cracking of carbon steel pipe than gasoline or diesel, but the study found that an ethanol pipeline could operate safely and without stress corrosion cracking when appropriate measures are taken. There are also siting and regulatory barriers, and such a project is unlikely to find affordable financing because of demand and supply uncertainty, and it would require government financial assistance.

The analysis by Poet and Magellan concluded that the project is economically viable with transportation rates about 15 percent lower than rail rates, and the venture becomes more viable with increased use of 15- and 85-percent blends.

On Friday, Broin said that the existing infrastructure for transporting ethanol serves the industry well.

"While a pipeline could improve the efficiency of ethanol distribution and lower costs for motorists, the system that we have in place today has allowed ethanol to flow seamlessly into more than 90 percent of the gasoline sold," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ethanol's Future
    I'm glad to hear ethanol is still a competitor in the energy sector. For some reason it seems to have taken a lot of bad press lately.

    I still think it is a terrific idea, the breadbasket of the world (USA) growing its own energy. Henry Ford originally planned cars to run on alcohol.

    Just because it was said to compete with food some have suggested it is a bad idea. I don't agree. There are many other sources for ethanol besides corn, and I haven't seen proof that we do not have enough tillable land to grow both, food and energy.

    I hope we continue research in distilling of other sources for ethanol. We have a rich history of successful agriculture in America and growing our energy from the sun is a great sustainable idea.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT