Lilly eying deal with Turkish drug company

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co., GlaxoSmithKline Plc and Pfizer Inc. are among about a half-dozen companies interested in buying a stake in Mustafa Nevzat Ilac Sanayii AS in a deal that may value the Turkish drugmaker at $1 billion, three people with knowledge of the situation said.

The owners of Mustafa Nevzat, or MN Pharmaceuticals as the Istanbul-based generic drugmaker is known, have hired Bank of America Merrill Lynch to advise on the sale, said the people, who declined to be identified because the plans are confidential.

Mylan Inc. and Abbott Laboratories are also among the companies interested in bidding, they said. Merrill Lynch has sent so-called teasers to potential bidders, and non-binding bids have begun to arrive, one of the people said, adding that the process started late last year. Preliminary bidding may be completed within two months, one of the people said.

Two other Turkish pharmaceutical companies—Abdi Ibrahim Ilac Sanayi & Ticaret, the country’s largest, and Biofarma Pharmaceutical Industry Co.—have failed in efforts to sell stakes over the past two years. While Glaxo is seeking deals in emerging markets, it’s becoming harder to find acquisitions that make “financial sense,” CEO Andrew Witty said last year.

MN’s owners, the children and grandchildren of the founder Mustafa Nevzat Pisak, have yet to decide whether to sell a minority or majority stake in the closely held company, two of the people said. The owners are seeking a price that values the company at 15 to 20 times earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, or Ebitda, one of the people said.

Turkey has been a popular target for deals in recent years, with companies seeking to tap its $735 billion economy, which grew 8.2 percent in the third quarter of 2011, the fastest rate among the Group of 20 countries after China.

Zentiva NV, a Czech drugmaker bought by Sanofi in 2009, bought 75 percent of the generic-drug unit of Turkey’s Eczacibasi in 2007 for $613 million, and later purchased the remaining 25-percent stake.

Cengiz Sezen, MN’s chairman, and CEO Levent Selamoglu didn’t respond to e-mailed questions about possible talks or return phone calls seeking comment.

Glaxo, the United Kingdom’s largest drugmaker, is interested in acquiring a pharmaceutical company in Turkey as it struggles to become profitable in the country, the newspaper Hurriyet said Jan. 29, citing Abbas Hussain, the drugmaker’s emerging markets president. Sarah Spencer, a Glaxo spokeswoman, declined to comment on whether MN is a potential target. Spokesmen for Abbott, Eli Lilly, Mylan and Pfizer also declined to comment.

MN was the first Turkish pharmaceutical company to win a license from the Food and Drug Administration to sell products in the U.S., according to the company’s website. International companies sought to do business with Mustafa Nevzat since it acquired the FDA license in 2006, Selamoglu said in an interview Sept. 28.

The company’s products are largely injectable medications, Selamoglu said. They range from antidepressants to diabetic treatments and antipsychotic agents, according to its website.

Eli Lilly and MN were in negotiations that had reached an “advanced stage” to sell drugs in 26 countries in South America, Asia, Europe and Africa, Selamoglu said at the time.

MN generates annual revenue of about $250 million by selling about 100 million boxes of its products in Turkey, Selamoglu said. The country’s drug market was $9.2 billion in 2010, according to the website of the Istanbul-based Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Turkey.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.