IBJNews

City narrows field of contenders vying to develop Mass Ave parcel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A midrise mix of apartments and first-floor retail is the most likely replacement for a triangle-shaped Mass Ave parcel occupied by the Indianapolis Fire Department.

fire-station-map0402.gifThe city is wrapping up its selection process for redevelopment of the 1.45-acre property bordered by Massachusetts Avenue, North New Jersey Street and East North Street.

Five bidders submitted proposals in November, and industry sources said the city and brokerage firm CB Richard Ellis, which the city hired to shepherd the process, have narrowed the field to three and plan to announce the successful bidder in the next few weeks.

Construction likely won’t begin for at least another year, though, because the city must first move the Indianapolis Fire Department headquarters, Fire Station No. 7 and the Firefighters Credit Union.

Simultaneously with its review of fire station redevelopment plans, CB Richard Ellis is helping the city scout for sites to relocate the fire department operations and to build a much-needed parking garage to serve the Mass Ave corridor and the new project.

Deputy Mayor Michael Huber said the city and CB are juggling multiple components that have to come together for the project to work. He declined to discuss timing or identify the bidders.

“We are excited about the quality of the responses and the ideas that were submitted,” he said.

Market observers expect the redevelopment proposals to range in price from $30 million to $50 million.

Two bidders confirmed submitting proposals, and real estate sources identified two other contenders. IBJ could not determine the fifth bidder by press time.

One of the finalist bidders is a high-powered partnership of apartment specialist J.C. Hart Co., jack-of-all-trades developer Paul Kite Co. and the architecture firm Schmidt Associates.

The team’s proposal calls for four or five stories of apartments over ground-floor commercial space along Mass Ave. Underground parking would serve the residential units above.

The structure would “feel” like Mass Ave, but with a “contemporary bent,” said Schmidt Associates principal Wayne Schmidt. He declined to share renderings or a final cost, citing competitive reasons.

“We feel like we have a good, solid proposal,” said Schmidt, whose 100-person firm has its headquarters at Massachusetts Avenue and Vermont Street. “Our firm has been involved in the Avenue through its entire rebirth. We look at Mass Ave as being our home.”

Flaherty & Collins Properties and Insight Development Corp., another finalist, are proposing a development that would tie in with their $25 million project across the street, which calls for a mix of market-rate and affordable apartments and retail space surrounding Barton Tower.

By developing both sites, the firms could realize some savings on financing and also achieve the “right mix” of retail and housing for that stretch of Mass Ave, Insight Development President Bruce Baird said in a statement.

“Our proposed vision for the firehouse site works in a cohesive fashion with our plans for the Barton side of the street,” Baird said.

“We see a mix of quality housing—all market rate on that side of the street—and a significant retail component that will attract shoppers and merchants and better connect Mass Ave between East and New Jersey streets.”

He declined to provide a project price or describe the proposal in more detail.

Bidders also include a joint effort by Milhaus Development and Shiel Sexton, and an offering by Monument Realty.

It also wasn’t clear which of the bidders besides the teams made up of Flaherty/Insight and Hart/Kite/Schmidt had made the city’s short list.

Principals with Milhaus and Monument Realty did not return phone messages. Officials with Shiel Sexton declined to discuss their bid. Milhaus already is working on a city-supported deal to redevelop the former home of the Bank One Operations Center into apartments.

Two other high-powered local developers, Keystone Group and Buckingham Cos., did not submit bids for the Mass Ave parcel. Keystone won a deal last year to build a parking and retail building for the city in Broad Ripple, and Buckingham is developing the city-supported CityWay project at Delaware and South streets.

In the case of the Mass Ave redevelopment, the city has asked bidders to pay for the site. City incentives likely would come in the form of subsidizing a parking garage or perhaps tax abatements.

The administration of Mayor Greg Ballard is running an unusually quiet selection process, refusing to disclose any information on the bids in response to public records requests, even the names of who is bidding, ostensibly so the city can gain some leverage over the bidders.

Years earlier, former Mayor Bart Peterson revealed detailed information about the bidders seeking to redevelop the Market Square Arena site, an endeavor that ultimately fizzled.

The failure of that project and a handful of other condo developments downtown painted a grim outlook for downtown residential, but a resurgence of apartments has rekindled optimism.

The empty-nester condo buyers never really materialized, but the apartment market—both in terms of occupancy and financing—continues to look strong, said Brian F. Knapp, director of special assets and investment services for the local office of Colliers International.

Knapp, who experienced the condo downturn firsthand when he had to return his Lockerbie Park project to lenders, said he’s less convinced about the prospects for a retail component in the Mass Ave redevelopment.

He’s concerned about the “revolving door” of tenants on the corridor and all the existing vacant spaces.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT