IBJNews

Simon CEO lands $137 million in compensation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group CEO David Simon's total compensation ballooned to an eye-popping $137.2 million last year, thanks to a new eight-year employment agreement, the company disclosed in its annual proxy statement.

As IBJ reported in July, David Simon must remain CEO of the world’s largest mall owner for at least six years to see any of the $120 million in special stock awards that the company’s board of directors awarded him last year, and he must stay on eight years to reap the full amount.

The agreement propels Simon, 50, into the stratosphere of executive compensation. In 2010, the highest-paid CEOs in the country were Viacom’s Philippe Dauman, who received total compensation of $84.5 million, including special stock awards, and Occidental Petroleum’s Ray Irani, who received $76.1 million.

In a lengthy rationale for the award, the compensation committee of Indianapolis-based Simon Property’s board of directors said David Simon has been offered jobs in other industries that would pay him far more than he had been making as leader of the company founded by his late father Melvin Simon and uncle Herb Simon.

David Simon received total compensation of $24.6 million in 2010 and $4.6 million in 2009. Without the special stock award last year, his compensation would have been $17.2 million, a 74-percent decline from the previous year.

“Given David Simon's vast experience, track record as a chief executive and relatively young age, he has had (and prior to the new arrangement, could have pursued) employment opportunities outside our company and in different industries,” wrote the compensation committee members, specifically citing private equity and investment banking. They added, “the committee considered the need for new and creative retention and compensation arrangements that could reflect David Simon's contributions and secure a long-term commitment from him to remain with us.”

The compensation committee members are Al Hubbard, CEO of Indianapolis-based buyout firm E&A Industries; Dan Smith, dean of the Indiana University Kelley School of Business; Melvyn Bergstein, former chairman of the Chicago-based management advisory firm Diamond Management & Technology Consultants Inc.; and Reuben Leibowitz, managing member of the New York-based private equity firm JEN Partners.

David Simon, who is chairman of the company’s board, negotiated with the compensation committee for 18 months before the new employment agreement was signed. The deal also includes a guaranteed salary of at least $1.25 million each year, annual stock awards equal to at least $12 million, and cash bonuses, based on performance targets, designed to yield double Simon’s annual salary.

In describing the new employment deal, the compensation committee gushed about Simon Property’s achievements under David Simon, who has been the company’s CEO since 1995.

“Our performance under David Simon's tenure as CEO over the past 17 years has been remarkable and unmatched within our industry,” the committee declared, adding, “His leadership has been integral to our record of performance. The company's equity market capitalization has increased from $2 billion in January 1995, when he was appointed CEO of the company's predecessor, to over $45.8 billion as of December 2011.”

David Simon has also led Simon Property’s significant international expansion, with malls in Europe, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea and Puerto Rico. And on Monday, the company announced a new joint venture to open outlet malls in Brazil. Simon owns a total of 337 retail properties nationwide, employing 5,500 people.

The committee concluded its rationale for Simon’s special award by stating, “The decision was subjective and not determined by reference to any peer group or formula.”

Simon Property's four other top executives saw their total compensation fall in 2011 compared with 2010, when special stock awards lifted pay totals by roughly fivefold over 2009. The value of the Simon Property stock awards in 2011 were smaller than the previous year, but still much larger than in 2009.

Company President Richard Sokolov saw his total compensation fall 23 percent, to $8.6 million. Chief Financial Officer Steve Sterritt took home $6.7 million, about 26 percent less than the previous year. General Counsel James Barkley received compensation of $6.9 million, a 30-percent decline over the previous year. And Chief Administrative Officer John Rulli received $3.4 million, a decline of 47 percent from 2010.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Surprise
    It doesn't surprise me. To go forward you must make some cuts, but to ruin many of the people's lives that got the company to this point, especially employees over the age of 55 & 60. Question, how many top executives sold stock?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT