IBJNews

NCAA faces firestorm after replacing Shaheen

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The NCAA has endured a public flogging for two days since it announced that it would replace Greg Shaheen as its chief of championship events, which includes the just-ended March Madness basketball tournaments.

Since Tuesday, fans and prominent journalists have fired off more than 150 messages on Twitter either blasting the Indianapolis-based NCAA or praising Shaheen, who had overseen all 89 of the NCAA’s championships—on an interim basis—since August 2010.

Greg ShaheenGreg Shaheen

But Shaheen had run the NCAA biggest show, the men’s basketball tournament, for more than a decade—including negotiating the mammoth $11 billion TV contract for the tournament with CBS and Turner Broadcasting.

Broadcasters Billy Packer and Dick Vitale called the NCAA’s decision “sad” and a “bad move” in Twitter messages. Duke University Coach Mike Krzyzewski told CBSSports.com that Shaheen’s removal is a “huge loss for our game.” And reporters for CBS and ESPN—the two main broadcasters of NCAA championship events—tweeted that the decision was “puzzling,” idiotic,” and a “damn shame.”

Replacing Shaheen will be Mark Lewis, a former sponsorship executive for NBC and the U.S. Olympic Committee, who most recently was president of New Jersey-based sports hospitality firm Jet Set Sports.

It’s not clear if Shaheen will remain with the NCAA. In a statement issued Tuesday by the NCAA, Lewis said, “Greg and I will be meeting over the next several days to discuss his role with the NCAA moving forward.”

The NCAA made no further comments about Shaheen. And Shaheen has declined to be interviewed about the change. He has, however, made comments supportive of the NCAA on Twitter.

“The NCAA's where I dreamed of working all my life. Here's to dreams realized, true friends and progress made enroute,” Shaheen tweeted on Tuesday. He said he would “be here tomorrow,” and added, “Mark Lewis inherits good people w/ innovative focus, 89 championships ready to roll. I'm excited to see the evolution continue!”

Shaheen, 44, is a Carmel native and Indiana University graduate. He was executive director of the Indiana Sports Corp. in the late 1990s before joining the NCAA in 2000, helping the organization move its headquarters from Kansas to Indianapolis.

The NCAA had to know the criticism was coming. It posted Shaheen’s job publicly in December. And while Shaheen was a candidate, some prominent NCAA coaches said they were mystified why he wasn’t a slam-dunk hire for the permanent position.

In a March 31 story in The New York Times, University of Kansas men’s basketball coach Bill Self said he was “shocked” at the possibility of Shaheen not returning. Michigan State University coach Tom Izzo said it “blows me away” that the NCAA was considering anyone but Shaheen to hold his job permanently.

“It’s hard for me to understand anything anymore except that everyone wants their own power,” Izzo told the newspaper.

Since the announcement of Lewis’ hiring, the criticism from sportswriters has been even harsher.

“But this is just further proof of how out of touch the people who work in the ivory towers in Indy are,” ESPN reporter Dana O’Neil wrote in a blog post. “The NCAA runs more like the KGB than an organization of and for its membership.”

O’Neil posted similar sentiments on Twitter, which were seconded by Vitale, a longtime ESPN sportscaster. “@gashaheen was passionate & devoted to March Madness - bad move by Emmett & his boys,” Vitale tweeted, referring to NCAA President Mark Emmert.

Many of the comments also showed a deep cynicism toward the NCAA.

“Thought @gashaheen was the best executive the NCAA had, so of course they're replacing him,” wrote CNBC sports business reporter Darren Rovell on Twitter, referring to Shaheen by his Twitter handle, @gashaheen.

“@gashaheen is (was?) pretty much the best thing about NCAA brass. Now it removed him from running the tournament. Flatly, it seems idiotic,” wrote CBSSports.com blogger Matt Norlander.

Local sports journalists also expressed displeasure. Anthony Calhoun, the sports reporter for WISH-TV Channel 8 in Indianapolis, tweeted, “So disappointed in the NCAA decision to replace @gashaheen He did so much for college hoops and for the coaches.”

Calhoun’s thoughts were retweeted by Chris Denari, who announces Indiana Pacers and Indiana Fever games on TV, who added his own thoughts: “I've known Greg since before he was at NCAA. He was an Indy NCAA volunteer. A great asset for NCAA and Indy. Bad move.”

Even some non-sports figures weighed in. NPR News anchor Steve Inskeep, who went to Carmel High School with Shaheen, tweeted, “Sorry old friend @gashaheen is done running March Madness.”

Todd Huston, a local Republican running for the state Legislature, tweeted, “Love the national support for @gashaheen. Greg is a great guy from a great family who will continue doing amazing things.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • The point was who is tweeting, not how many
    Please the article was about who supports Sheehan, not about trending...the number of followers you have on twitter is not representative that you are tweeting anything of worth or Bieber wouldn't have 3 million...the fact that numbers are the only thing that matters to "not even trending" is proof that tweeting means nothing at all...Shaheen did a great job...he will be missed.
  • Thanks
    Thanks for the insightful reporting of regurgitating twitter feeds...quality reporting.
  • 150 Tweets!
    Only a 150 Tweets? #noteventrending

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT